+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Validation of different pediatric triage systems in the emergency department



Validation of different pediatric triage systems in the emergency department



World Journal of Emergency Medicine 8(3): 223-227



Triage system in children seems to be more challenging compared to adults because of their different response to physiological and psychosocial stressors. This study aimed to determine the best triage system in the pediatric emergency department. This was a prospective observational study. This study was divided into two phases. The first phase determined the inter-rater reliability of five triage systems: Manchester Triage System (MTS), Emergency Severity Index (ESI) version 4, Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), Australasian Triage Scale (ATS), and Ramathibodi Triage System (RTS) by triage nurses and pediatric residents. In the second phase, to analyze the validity of each triage system, patients were categorized as two groups, i.e., high acuity patients (triage level 1, 2) and low acuity patients (triage level 3, 4, and 5). Then we compared the triage acuity with actual admission. In phase I, RTS illustrated almost perfect inter-rater reliability with kappa of 1.0 (P<0.01). ESI and CTAS illustrated good inter-rater reliability with kappa of 0.8-0.9 (P<0.01). Meanwhile, ATS and MTS illustrated moderate to good inter-rater reliability with kappa of 0.5-0.7 (P<0.01). In phase II, we included 1 041 participants with average age of 4.7±4.2 years, of which 55% were male and 45% were female. In addition 32% of the participants had underlying diseases, and 123 (11.8%) patients were admitted. We found that ESI illustrated the most appropriate predicting ability for admission with sensitivity of 52%, specificity of 81%, and AUC 0.78 (95%CI 0.74-0.81). RTS illustrated almost perfect inter-rater reliability. Meanwhile, ESI and CTAS illustrated good inter-rater reliability. Finally, ESI illustrated the appropriate validity for triage system.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 060455923

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28680520

DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.03.010


Related references

Validation of a Modified Triage Scale in a Norwegian Pediatric Emergency Department. International Journal of Pediatrics 2018: 4676758-4676758, 2018

Respiratory diseases in pediatric triage: a comparison between a general emergency department and a pediatric emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care 30(2): 81-83, 2014

A survey of emergency department triage in 185 hospitals: physical facilities, fast-track systems, patient-classification systems, waiting times, and qualification, training, and skills of triage personnel. Journal of Emergency Nursing: Jen 17(6): 402-407, 1991

Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators?. Cjem 5(5): 315-322, 2007

Accuracy of emergency department triage using the Emergency Severity Index and independent predictors of under-triage and over-triage in Brazil: a retrospective cohort analysis. International Journal of Emergency Medicine 11(1): 3-3, 2018

A Web-Based Tool for Patient Triage in Emergency Department Settings: Validation Using the Emergency Severity Index. Jmir Medical Informatics 3(2): E23-E23, 2015

Metadata Correction: A Web-Based Tool for Patient Triage in Emergency Department Settings: Validation Using the Emergency Severity Index. Jmir Medical Informatics 3(3): E24-E24, 2015

Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage. Pediatric Emergency Care 28(8): 753-757, 2013

The Validity of the Pediatric Assessment Triangle as the First Step in the Triage Process in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatric Emergency Care (): -, 2016

Triage and satisfaction in the pediatric emergency department. Clinical Research 41(4): 759A, 1993

Impact of a triage scale in a pediatric emergency department. Archives de Pediatrie 13(12): 1507-1513, 2006

Special considerations for pediatric triage in the emergency department. Nursing Clinics of North America 37(1): 145-59, Viii, 2002

Triage of the pediatric patient in the emergency department: are we all in agreement?. Pediatrics 114(2): 356-360, 2004

Triage systems in the emergency department. Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin 107(1): 67-78; Quiz 79, 2012

Implications of the emergency department triage environment on triage practice for clients with a mental illness at triage in an Australian context. Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal 17(1): 23-29, 2014