Psychometric properties of the neurobehavioral cognitive status exam
Engelhart, C.; Eisenstein, N.; Meininger, J.
Clinical Neuropsychologist 8(4): 405-415
1994
ISSN/ISBN: 1385-4046
DOI: 10.1080/13854049408402043
Accession: 062403788
PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90
Related References
Logue, P.E.; Tupler, L.A.; D'Amico, C.; Schmitt, F.A. 1993: The neurobehavioral cognitive status examination: Psychometric properties in use with psychiatric inpatients Journal of Clinical Psychology 49(1): 80-89Shea, T.; Kane, C.; Mickens, M. 2017: A review of the use and psychometric properties of the Cognistat/Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination in adults post-cerebrovascular accident Rehabilitation Psychology 62(2): 221-222
Marcotte, T.D.; van Gorp, W.; Hinkin, C.H.; Osato, S. 1997: Concurrent validity of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam subtests Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 19(3): 386-395
Wiederman, M W.; Morgan, C. Don 1995: The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam (NCSE) with Geriatric Inpatients Clinical Gerontologist 15(4): 35-47
Eisenstein, N.; Engelhart, C.I.; Johnson, V.; Wolf, J.; Williamson, J.; Losonczy, M.B. 2002: Normative data for healthy elderly persons with the neurobehavioral cognitive status exam (Cognistat) Applied Neuropsychology 9(2): 110-113
Walker, N.W.; Capuco, J.T.; Lawler, K.A. 1989: Comparison of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam (NCSE) vs. full neuropsychological battery in a TBI population Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 4(2): 120-121
Engelhart, C.; Eisenstein, N.; Johnson, V.; Wolf, J.; Williamson, J.; Steitz, D.; Girard, V.; Paramatmuni, K.; Ouzounian, N.; Losonczy, M. 1999: Factor structure of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam (COGNISTAT) in healthy, and psychiatrically and neurologically impaired, elderly adults Clinical Neuropsychologist 13(1): 109-111
Doninger, N A.; Ehde, D M.; Bode, R K.; Knight, K; Bombardier, C H.; Heinemann, A W. 2006: Measurement properties of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination (Cognistat) in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation Rehabilitation Psychology 51(4): 281-288
Kempen, G.I.J.M.; Meier, A.J.L.; Bouwens, S.F.M.; van Deursen, J.; Verhey, F.R.J. 2007: The psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Telephone Interview Cognitive Status (TICS) Tijdschrift Voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie 38(1): 38-45
Cruz-Oliver, D.M.; Malmstrom, T.K.; Allen, C.M.; Tumosa, N.; Morley, J.E. 2012: The Veterans Affairs Saint Louis University mental status exam (SLUMS exam) and the Mini-mental status exam as predictors of mortality and institutionalization Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging 16(7): 636-641
Kiernan, R.J.; Mueller, J.; Langston, J.W.; Van Dyke, C. 1987: The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: a brief but quantitative approach to cognitive assessment Annals of Internal Medicine 107(4): 481-485
Whiteside, D M.; Padula, M A.; Jeffrey, L K.; Zetterman, R 1996: Cognitive screening with the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination in a chronic liver disease population Clinical Neuropsychologist 10(4): 459-463
Sikaroodi, H.; Yadegari, S.; Miri, S.R. 2013: Cognitive impairments in patients with cerebrovascular risk factors: a comparison of Mini Mental Status Exam and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 115(8): 1276-1280
Mysiw, W.J.; Beegan, J.G.; Gatens, P.F. 1989: Prospective cognitive assessment of stroke patients before inpatient rehabilitation. the relationship of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination to functional improvement American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 68(4): 168-171
Blostein, P.A.; Jones, S.J.; Buechler, C.M.; Vandongen, S. 1997: Cognitive screening in mild traumatic brain injuries: analysis of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination when utilized during initial trauma hospitalization Journal of Neurotrauma 14(3): 171-177