+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A United States costbenefit comparison of an apodized, diffractive, presbyopia-correcting, multifocal intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal lens



A United States costbenefit comparison of an apodized, diffractive, presbyopia-correcting, multifocal intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal lens



Yearbook of Ophthalmology 2009: 4-5




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 063744611

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/s0084-392x(09)79036-7


Related references

A United States cost-benefit comparison of an apodized, diffractive, presbyopia-correcting, multifocal intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal lens. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 34(11): 1855-1861, 2008

A comparison of patient-reported outcomes from an apodized diffractive intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal intraocular lens. Current Medical Research and Opinion 22(12): 2591-2602, 2006

Comparison on visual function after implantation of an apodized diffractive aspheric multifocal or monofocal intraocular lens. Eye Science 27(1): 5-12, 2015

Visual function after monocular implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal or single-piece monofocal intraocular lens Randomized prospective comparison. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 36(2): 282-285, 2010

Comparison of a new-generation sectorial addition multifocal intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized multifocal intraocular lens. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 38(1): 68-73, 2012

Dual intraocular lens implantation: Monofocal lens in the bag and additional diffractive multifocal lens in the sulcus. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 35(12): 2136-2143, 2010

Clear lens extraction with multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 114(8): 1491-1498, 2007

Comparison of a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. International Ophthalmology 33(5): 493-500, 2014

Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens. Clinical Ophthalmology 10: 455-461, 2016

A prospective randomized double masked comparison of a zonal progressive multifocal intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 99(6): 853-860, 1992

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-masked Comparison of a Zonal-Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens and a Monofocal Intraocular Lens. Ophthalmology 99(6): 853-861, 1992

The observation of visual quality after the implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. Yan Ke Xue Bao 23(2): 79-83, 2007

Five-year postoperative outcomes of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 2013, 2013

Comparison of a new refractive multifocal intraocular lens with an inferior segmental near add and a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 119(3): 555-563, 2012

Clinical observation of visual performance in patients with a apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology 45(2): 122-126, 2010