+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparative Study of Breast Implant Rupture Using Mammography, Sonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Correlation with Surgical Findings



Comparative Study of Breast Implant Rupture Using Mammography, Sonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Correlation with Surgical Findings



Yearbook of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery 2010: 186-187




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 063900984

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/s1535-1513(08)79250-6


Related references

Comparative study of breast implant rupture using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with surgical findings. Breast Journal 14(6): 532-537, 2008

Comparison of mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of silicone-gel breast implant rupture. Annals of Plastic Surgery 33(3): 247-55; Discussion 256-7, 1994

Evaluation of the rupture of silicone breast implants by mammography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic patients: correlation with surgical findings. Sao Paulo Medical Journal 122(2): 41-47, 2004

Comparative Silicone Breast Implant Evaluation Using Mammography, Sonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 94(5): 620-627, 1994

Comparative silicone breast implant evaluation using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: experience with 59 implants. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 94(5): 620-627, 1994

Silicone Breast Implant Rupture: Pitfalls of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Relative Efficacies of Magnetic Resonance, Mammography, and Ultrasound. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 104(7): 2054-2062, 1999

Silicone breast implant rupture: pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 104(7): 2054-2062, 1999

Invasive Lobular Cancer of the Breast: A Pictorial Essay of Imaging Findings on Mammography, Sonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 67(3): 263-276, 2016

Efficacy of ultrasound, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting breast implant rupture: A retrospective study of 175 reconstructive and aesthetic sub-pectoral breast augmentation cases. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery 70(11): 1520-1526, 2017

The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Plastic Surgery 54(6): 583-589, 2005

The Life Span of Silicone Gel Breast Implants and a Comparison of Mammography, Ultrasonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Implant Rupture. Annals of Plastic Surgery 41(6): 577-586, 1998

The life span of silicone gel breast implants and a comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting implant rupture: a meta-analysis. Annals of Plastic Surgery 41(6): 577-85; Discussion 585-6, 1998

Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Research 3(1): 55-60, 2001

Diagnostic breast imaging Mammography, sonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and interventional procedures. Heywang-Koebrunner, Sylvia H , Dershaw, D David , Schreer, Ingrid Diagnostic breast imaging: Mammography, sonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and interventional procedures i-xiii, 1-481, 2001

Diagnostic Breast Imaging: Mammography, Sonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Interventional Procedures, 3rd edition. Ultrasound 22(3): 182-183, 2014