+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention



Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention



Yearbook of Cardiology 2010: 340-342




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 063928115

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/s0145-4145(09)79763-1


Related references

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 56(3): 177-184, 2010

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. New England Journal of Medicine 360(3): 213-224, 2009

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. Heart 101(6): 455-462, 2015

The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy. International Journal of Cardiology 177(1): 66-70, 2014

The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 5(10): 1037-1042, 2012

Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation). Circulation 137(5): 480-487, 2018

Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: a comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. American Heart Journal 170(4): 619-626.E2, 2015

Tc-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 26(2): 203-213, 2010

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 92(1): 18-27, 2018

Comparison of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus and having elective percutaneous coronary intervention and abciximab therapy (from the PREDICT Trial). American Journal of Cardiology 101(6): 796-800, 2008

TCTAP C-212 Low Fractional Flow Reserve After Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Who Is Liar, Angiography, FFR, or PET?. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 65(17): S442-S443, 2015

Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 12(6): 480-492, 2018

Comparison of angiography-guided and fractional flow reserve-guided management strategy of percutaneous coronary intervention for intermediate coronary lesions. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. Yi Xue Ban 46(6): 844-847, 2014

Clinical significance of concordance or discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve for coronary physiological indices, microvascular resistance, and prognosis after elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Eurointervention 14(7): 798-805, 2018

Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve. Jacc. Cardiovascular Imaging 5(11): 1088-1096, 2013