+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Can we predict the risk of caesarean section in induction of labour (IOL) for postdates in nulliparous women?



Can we predict the risk of caesarean section in induction of labour (IOL) for postdates in nulliparous women?



Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 97(Suppl 1): A95.2-A95




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 064172965

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1136/fetalneonatal-2012-301809.310


Related references

Induction of labour for postdates in nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancy - is the caesarean section rate really lower?. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 36(7): 916-920, 2016

OP07.06: Can ultrasound assessed fetal position predict Caesarean section in nulliparous women with prolonged first stage of labour?. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 44(S1): 78-78, 2014

O344 Elective Induction Of Labour In Parous Women And The Risk Of Caesarean Section. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 119: S381-S382, 2012

What is the best treatment to reduce the need for caesarean section in nulliparous women at term with delayed first stage of labour?. Bmj 357: J2469, 2017

The effect of change in a labour management protocol on caesarean section rate in nulliparous women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 35(6): 508-514, 2013

Elective induction of labour increases caesarean section rate in low risk multiparous women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 32(3): 257-259, 2012

Improving induction of labour - a quality improvement project addressing Caesarean section rates and length of process in women undergoing induction of labour. Bmj Quality Improvement Reports 4(1):, 2015

Risk of uterine rupture following induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section in a large UK teaching hospital. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 24(3): 264-265, 2004

Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006(4): Cd004906, 2006

Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014(12): Cd004906, 2014

Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012(5): Cd004906, 2012

Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7: Cd004906, 2017

Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes. Bjog 121(6): 674-85; Discussion 685, 2014

An audit of induction of labour using misoprostol in women with a planned trial of labour after caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Abingdon) 20(Suppl 1): S52, 2000

Emergency caesarean section in low risk nulliparous women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 32(6): 543-547, 2012