+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Not All Systematic Reviews are Systematic: A Meta-review of the Quality of Current Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Remote Monitoring in Heart Failure



Not All Systematic Reviews are Systematic: A Meta-review of the Quality of Current Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Remote Monitoring in Heart Failure



Heart Lung & Circulation 22: S84-S85




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 064356818

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2013.05.201


Related references

Not all systematic reviews are systematic: a meta-review of the quality of systematic reviews for non-invasive remote monitoring in heart failure. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 19(6): 326-337, 2014

A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open 6(11): E011514, 2018

Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. Plos One 8(12): E83138, 2014

When poorly conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses can mislead: a critical appraisal and update of systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining the effects of probiotics in the treatment of functional constipation in children. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2019, 2019

Evaluating the methodologic quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews. Rofo 185(10): 937-940, 2014

Evaluation of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews). Rofo 184(10): 937-940, 2013

A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery. Plos One 12(4): E0175213, 2017

The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1395, 2017

The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: a systematic review. International Journal of Surgery 12(12): 1262-1265, 2015

Dental and skeletal effects of palatal expansion techniques: a systematic review of the current evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 43(7): 543-564, 2017

Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses). Rofo 183(12): 1106-1110, 2012

Methodological quality evaluation of systematic reviews or meta-analyses on ERCC1 in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 143(11): 2245-2256, 2017

The impact of telehealth remote patient monitoring on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Bmc Health Services Research 18(1): 495, 2018

Effects of fixed orthodontic brackets on oral malodor: A systematic review and meta-analysis according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Medicine 97(14): E0233, 2018

Tu1628 - Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Existing Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Probiotic use in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Gastroenterology 154(6): S-974, 2018