+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparative Contraceptive Effectiveness of Levonorgestrel-Releasing and Copper Intrauterine Devices

Comparative Contraceptive Effectiveness of Levonorgestrel-Releasing and Copper Intrauterine Devices

Obstetric and Gynecologic Survey 70(5): 317-318

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 064644956

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000466339.43485.6e

Related references

Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices. Contraception 91(4): 280-283, 2015

Protective effect of intrauterine release of levonorgestrel on pelvic infection: three years' comparative experience of levonorgestrel- and copper-releasing intrauterine devices. Obstetrics and Gynecology 77(2): 261-264, 1991

Two years' experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a randomized comparative performance study. Fertility and Sterility 39(2): 187-192, 1983

Risk of contraceptive failure and ectopic pregnancy in users of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper iuds: final results from the european active surveillance study on intrauterine devices. Fertility and Sterility 102(3): E11-E12, 2014

Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception 91(4): 274-279, 2015

Rates and outcomes of planned pregnancy after use of Norplant capsules, Norplant II rods, or levonorgestrel-releasing or copper TCu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 166(4): 1208-1213, 1992

Puerperal insertion of a copper-releasing and a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device. Contraception 25(6): 561-572, 1982

Sexual functioning in women using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems as compared to copper intrauterine devices. Journal of Sexual Medicine 9(4): 1065-1073, 2012

Contraceptive Effectiveness of Levonorgestrel Releasing Intrauterine System. Medical Journal Armed Forces India 64(2): 140-142, 2008

Ultrastructural comparative study on endometrium of Chinese women using intrauterine devices of stainless steel ring, copper T220, and releasing levonorgestrel: morphometry of microvessels. Contraception 41(4): 389-397, 1990

Hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels in women using copper-releasing or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices: a systematic review. Contraception 87(4): 486-496, 2013

Extended Effectiveness of the Etonogestrel-Releasing Contraceptive Implant and the 20 µg Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for 2 Years Beyond U.S. Food and Drug Administration Product Labeling. Global Health Science and Practice 5(4): 534-539, 2017

A comparative study of the effectiveness of the Lippes Loop, the Copper-T-200, and the Nova-T intrauterine contraceptive devices in Lagos, Nigeria. International Journal of Fertility 27(2): 109-112, 1982

Health during prolonged use of levonorgestrel 20g/d and the Copper Tcu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices: a multicenter study*. Fertility and Sterility 61(1): 70-77, 1994

Levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices and the risk of breast cancer. Contraception 83(3): 211-217, 2011