+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research Should Not Consider the Risks of the Standard Therapies That Are Being Studied as Risks of the Research



Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research Should Not Consider the Risks of the Standard Therapies That Are Being Studied as Risks of the Research



Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 45(3): 365-374




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065007599

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1177/1073110517737537


Related references

Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research Should Include Risks of Standard Care. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 45(3): 352-364, 2017

Informed consent in implantable BCI research: identification of research risks and recommendations for development of best practices. Journal of Neural Engineering 13(4): 043001, 2017

Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study. Global Qualitative Nursing Research 4: 2333393617732017, 2017

Informed Consent in Implantable BCI Research: Identifying Risks and Exploring Meaning. Science and Engineering Ethics 22(5): 1299-1317, 2015

Ethical issues in clinical research. Informed consent and risks versus benefits in the treatment of primary hypertension. Nursing Clinics of North America 24(4): 1033-1039, 1989

Foreseeable risks? Informed consent for studies within the standard of care. New England Journal of Medicine 372(4): 306-307, 2015

Risk, respect for persons, and informed consent in comparative effectiveness research. American Journal of Bioethics 13(12): 46-48, 2014

The role of informed consent in risks recall in otorhinolaryngology surgeries: verbal (nonintervention) vs written (intervention) summaries of risks. American Journal of Otolaryngology 32(6): 485-489, 2012

Ethics and informed consent for comparative effectiveness research with prospective electronic clinical data. Medical Care 51(8 Suppl 3): S53-S57, 2013

The great "informed consent" debate: should the disclosure of risks and alternatives by physicians be standard pre-operating procedure?. Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia 72(4): 285-288, 1983

The effect of the FDAs final rule on informed consent and waiver of informed consent in emergency research circumstances on human cardiac arrest research in the United States. Circulation 106(19 Suppl.): II 367, November 5, 2002

Risks (and benefits) in comparative effectiveness research trials. New England Journal of Medicine 369(10): 892-894, 2013

Comparative effectiveness research: what to do when experts disagree about risks. Bmc Medical Ethics 18(1): 42, 2018

Informed consent in medical research. Journals should not publish research to which patients have not given fully informed consent--with three exceptions. BMJ 314(7087): 1107-1111, 1997

Risks and benefits of comparative effectiveness research in preterm infants: SUPPORT. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 3(1): 17-21, 2014