+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Feasibility study of individualized optimal positioning selection for left-sided whole breast radiotherapy: DIBH or prone



Feasibility study of individualized optimal positioning selection for left-sided whole breast radiotherapy: DIBH or prone



Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 19(2): 218-229



The deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and prone (P) position are two common heart-sparing techniques for external-beam radiation treatment of left-sided breast cancer patients. Clinicians select the position that is deemed to be better for tissue sparing based on their experience. This approach, however, is not always optimum and consistent. In response to this, we develop a quantitative tool that predicts the optimal positioning for the sake of organs at risk (OAR) sparing. Sixteen left-sided breast cancer patients were considered in the study, each received CT scans in the supine free breathing, supine DIBH, and prone positions. Treatment plans were generated for all positions. A patient was classified as DIBH or P using two different criteria: if that position yielded (1) lower heart dose, or (2) lower weighted OAR dose. Ten anatomical features were extracted from each patient's data, followed by the principal component analysis. Sequential forward feature selection was implemented to identify features that give the best classification performance. Nine statistical models were then applied to predict the optimal positioning and were evaluated using stratified k-fold cross-validation, predictive accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). For heart toxicity-based classification, the support vector machine with radial basis function kernel yielded the highest accuracy (0.88) and AUROC (0.80). For OAR overall toxicities-based classification, the quadratic discriminant analysis achieved the highest accuracy (0.90) and AUROC (0.84). For heart toxicity-based classification, Breast volume and the distance between Heart and Breast were the most frequently selected features. For OAR overall toxicities-based classification, Heart volume, Breast volume and the distance between ipsilateral lung and breast were frequently selected. Given the patient data considered in this study, the proposed statistical model is feasible to provide predictions for DIBH and prone position selection as well as indicate important clinical features that affect the position selection.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065149617

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29436168

DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12283


Related references

Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer: Dosimetrical comparison and clinical feasibility in 20 patients. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 191(9): 710-716, 2015

EP-1203: DIBH for left-sided breast radiotherapy: Does this equate to a reduction in OAR doses?. RadioTherapy and Oncology 111: S55-S56, 2014

DIBH radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer patients using an optical surface scanning system. Breast 32: S70-S71, 2017

PO-0845: Clinical evaluation of DIBH radiotherapy to reduce cardiac mortality in left-sided breast cancer patients. RadioTherapy and Oncology 111: S78-S79, 2014

Treatment planning and evaluation of gated radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer patients using the Catalyst TM /Sentinel TM system for deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). Radiation Oncology 11(1): 143, 2016

Prospective trial of individual optimal positioning (prone versus supine) for whole breast radiotherapy: results of 194 patients.. 2007

Deep-learning based surface region selection for deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) monitoring in left breast cancer radiotherapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2018, 2018

Ep-2039: Reproducibility and stability of Dibh in intra and inter fraction in Rt of left-sided breast cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology 127: S1114-S1115, 2018

A simple clinical method for predicting the benefit of prone vs. supine positioning in reducing heart exposure during left breast radiotherapy. RadioTherapy and Oncology 126(3): 487-492, 2018

EP-1630: The impact of DIBH on dose to the junction in loco-regionally treated left-sided breast patients. RadioTherapy and Oncology 123: S883-S884, 2017

Comparison of Heart Dose in Early Stage Left Sided Breast Cancers Treated with Iort or Ebrt-Dibh. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 99(2): E1-E2, 2017

Robustness of VMAT and 3DCRT plans toward setup errors in radiation therapy of locally advanced left-sided breast cancer with DIBH. Physica Medica 45: 12-18, 2018

Assessment of Upfront Selection Criteria to Prioritise Patients for Breath-hold Left-sided Breast Radiotherapy. Clinical Oncology ) 29(6): 356-361, 2017

Postoperative irradiation of left-sided breast cancer patients and cardiac toxicity. Does deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique protect the heart?. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 184(7): 354-358, 2008

Reproducibility of the external surface position in left-breast DIBH radiotherapy with spirometer-based monitoring. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 15(1): 4494, 2014