+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Generic health literacy measurement instruments for children and adolescents: a systematic review of the literature



Generic health literacy measurement instruments for children and adolescents: a systematic review of the literature



Bmc Public Health 18(1): 166



Health literacy is an important health promotion concern and recently children and adolescents have been the focus of increased academic attention. To assess the health literacy of this population, researchers have been focussing on developing instruments to measure their health literacy. Compared to the wider availability of instruments for adults, only a few tools are known for younger age groups. The objective of this study is to systematically review the field of generic child and adolescent health literacy measurement instruments that are currently available. A systematic literature search was undertaken in five databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycNET, ERIC, and FIS) on articles published between January 1990 and July 2015, addressing children and adolescents ≤18 years old. Eligible articles were analysed, data was extracted, and synthesised according to review objectives. Fifteen generic health literacy measurement instruments for children and adolescents were identified. All, except two, are self-administered instruments. Seven are objective measures (performance-based tests), seven are subjective measures (self-reporting), and one uses a mixed-method measurement. Most instruments applied a broad and multidimensional understanding of health literacy. The instruments were developed in eight different countries, with most tools originating in the United States (n = 6). Among the instruments, 31 different components related to health literacy were identified. Accordingly, the studies exhibit a variety of implicit or explicit conceptual and operational definitions, and most instruments have been used in schools and other educational contexts. While the youngest age group studied was 7-year-old children within a parent-child study, there is only one instrument specifically designed for primary school children and none for early years. Despite the reported paucity of health literacy research involving children and adolescents, an unexpected number of health literacy measurement studies in children's populations was found. Most instruments tend to measure their own specific understanding of health literacy and not all provide sufficient conceptual information. To advance health literacy instruments, a much more standardised approach is necessary including improved reporting on the development and validation processes. Further research is required to improve health literacy instruments for children and adolescents and to provide knowledge to inform effective interventions.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065170562

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29357867

DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5054-0


Related references

Health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: a systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments. Value in Health 11(4): 742-764, 2008

Quality of health literacy instruments used in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Bmj Open 8(6): E020080, 2018

Self-administered health literacy instruments for people with diabetes: systematic review of measurement properties. Journal of Advanced Nursing 73(9): 2035-2048, 2017

Measurement properties of quality-of-life measurement instruments for infants, children and adolescents with eczema: a systematic review. British Journal of Dermatology 176(4): 878-889, 2017

Measurement properties of quality of life measurement instruments for infants, children and adolescents with eczema: protocol for a systematic review. Systematic Reviews 5: 25, 2016

Measurement properties of instruments to assess pain in children and adolescents with cancer: a systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews 8(1): 33, 2019

Parent/caregiver health literacy among children with special health care needs: a systematic review of the literature. Bmc Pediatrics 15: 92, 2015

Assessing oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: a systematic review and standardized comparison of available instruments. Clinical Oral Investigations 23(1): 65-79, 2019

Is parental oral health literacy a predictor of children's oral health outcomes? Systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2018:, 2018

Health literacy screening instruments for eHealth applications: a systematic review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 45(3): 598-607, 2012

Efficacy of instruments measuring oral health literacy: a systematic review. Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry 12(3): 201-207, 2014

Measuring Health Utilities in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Plos one 10(8): E0135672, 2015

Do adolescents understand the items of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) - German version? Findings from cognitive interviews of the project "Measurement of Health Literacy Among Adolescents" (MOHLAA) in Germany. Archives of Public Health 76: 46, 2018

Systematic review: health-related quality of life in children and adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis-instruments for measurement and determinant factors. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 46(4): 401-409, 2017

Generic health-related quality of life instruments in children and adolescents: a qualitative analysis of content. Journal of Adolescent Health 34(1): 37-45, 2004