+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Modelling



Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Modelling



Ophthalmology 125(10): 1492-1499



Presbyopia prevalence and spectacle-correction coverage were estimated by systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic evidence, then modeled to expand to country, region, and global estimates. Understanding presbyopia epidemiologic factors and correction coverage is critical to overcoming the burden of vision impairment (VI) from uncorrected presbyopia. We performed systematic reviews of presbyopia prevalence and spectacle-correction coverage. Accepted presbyopia prevalence data were gathered into 5-year age groups from 0 to 90 years or older and meta-analyzed within World Health Organization global burden of disease regions. We developed a model based on amplitude of accommodation adjusted for myopia rates to match the regionally meta-analyzed presbyopia prevalence. Presbyopia spectacle-correction coverage was analyzed against country-level variables from the year of data collection; variation in correction coverage was described best by a model based on the Human Development Index, Gini coefficient, and health expenditure, with adjustments for age and urbanization. We used the models to estimate presbyopia prevalence and spectacle-correction coverage in each age group in urban and rural areas of every country in the world, and combined with population data to estimate the number of people with near VI. We estimate there were 1.8 billion people (prevalence, 25%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-2.0 billion [23%-27%]) globally with presbyopia in 2015, 826 million (95% CI, 686-960 million) of whom had near VI because they had no, or inadequate, vision correction. Global unmet need for presbyopia correction in 2015 is estimated to be 45% (95% CI, 41%-49%). People with presbyopia are more likely to have adequate optical correction if they live in an urban area of a more developed country with higher health expenditure and lower inequality. There is a significant burden of VI from uncorrected presbyopia, with the greatest burden in rural areas of low-resource countries.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065177531

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29753495

DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.013


Related references

Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia. Archives of Ophthalmology 126(12): 1731-1739, 2008

Prevalence of refractive errors, uncorrected refractive error, and presbyopia in adults in India: A systematic review. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 67(5): 583-592, 2019

Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. Global Health 5(9): E888-E897, 2017

Prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors, presbyopia and spectacle coverage in marine fishing communities in South India: Rapid Assessment of Visual Impairment (RAVI) project. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 32(2): 149-155, 2012

Global prevalence of visual impairment associated with myopic macular degeneration and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050: systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling. British Journal of Ophthalmology 102(7): 855-862, 2018

Computer vision syndrome in presbyopia and beginning presbyopia: effects of spectacle lens type. Clinical and Experimental Optometry 98(3): 228-233, 2016

Monovision Versus Multifocality for Presbyopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Advances in Therapy 34(8): 1815-1839, 2017

The Global Burden of Potential Productivity Loss from Uncorrected Presbyopia. Ophthalmology 122(8): 1706-1710, 2015

Prevalence, Correlates, and Impact of Uncorrected Presbyopia in a Multiethnic Asian Population. American Journal of Ophthalmology 168: 191-200, 2017

Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. Global Health 5(12): E1221-E1234, 2017

Presbyopia and near-vision impairment in rural northern China. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 52(5): 2300-2305, 2011

Quality of life and near vision impairment due to functional presbyopia among rural Chinese adults. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 52(7): 4118-4123, 2011

Towards better estimates of uncorrected presbyopia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 93(10): 667, 2015

Presbyopia and Ocular Conditions Causing Near Vision Impairment in Older Adults From the Brazilian Amazon Region. American Journal of Ophthalmology 196: 72-81, 2018

Refraction during incipient presbyopia: The Aston Longitudinal Assessment of Presbyopia (ALAP) study. Journal of Optometry 11(1): 49-56, 2017