+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Greater trochanter of the femur (GTF) vs. proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture



Greater trochanter of the femur (GTF) vs. proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture



European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 22(1 Suppl): 8-14



We aim to compare the effects of stem type prosthesis implantation of the greater trochanter of the femur (GTF) and proximal femur nail anti-rotation (PFNA) for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture. We retrospectively analyzed 108 patients with unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture, including 61 cases who underwent GTF treatment and 47 cases who underwent PFNA treatment. We compared the operative time, blood loss, clinical healing and bone healing time, partial weight bearing and full weight bearing time, Harris hip score, rate of complications and rate of adverse reactions of implantation materials. Comparing the two groups in terms of operative time and blood loss, the differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The clinical and bone healing time in the GTF group were shorter than those in the PFNA group and the differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). The partial and full-weight bearing times in the GTF group were significantly shorter than those in the PFNA group. The Harris scores, one and six months after surgery, were higher than those in the PFNA group and by comparing the scores after 12 and 18 months, the differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The rate of complications and rate of adverse reactions of implantation material in the GTF group were lower than those in the PFNA group and the differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). GTF implantation is more advantageous in functional improvement and in reducing complications compared with PFNA for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 065181073

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30004569


Related references

Comparison of the effect of inverted less invasive stabilization system (LISS) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of complex unstable intertrochanteric fracture in aged. Zhongguo Gu Shang 24(5): 366-369, 2011

Radiographic Outcomes of Osteosynthesis Using Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) System in Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture: Has PFNA II Solved All the Problems?. Hip and Pelvis 29(2): 104-112, 2017

A Comparison of the Clinico-Radiological Outcomes with Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) and Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) in Fixation of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 11(7): Rc05, 2017

A retrospective analysis of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 11: 10, 2016

An unusual case of femoral head perforation following fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-II) for an unstable intertrochanteric fracture: Case report and literature review. Trauma Case Reports 20: 100178, 2019

Comparative study of proximal femoral shortening after the third generation of Gamma nail versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 32(3): 338-345, 2018

Radiographic and functional results of osteosynthesis using the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 44(2): 127-134, 2010

Clinical observation of proximal femoral anti-rotation nail for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture. Zhongguo Gu Shang 30(10): 915-919, 2017

Effectiveness comparison between proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and proximal femoral locking compression plate for intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients combined with hemiplegia due to cerebral infarction. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 32(11): 1411-1416, 2018

Comparison of clinical effect betweem reconstructing femoral calcar and proximal femoral antirotation nail for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients. Zhongguo Gu Shang 29(8): 684-688, 2016

Less invasive stabilization system (LISS) versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in treating proximal femoral fractures: a prospective randomized study. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 26(3): 155-162, 2012

Less Invasive Stabilization System (Liss) Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation (Pfna) in Treating Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Prospective Randomized study. Yearbook of Orthopedics 2012: 82-83, 2012

Does the PFNA™ nail limit impaction in unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture? A 115 case-control series. Orthopaedics and Traumatology Surgery and Research 101(1): 45-49, 2015

Efficacy of femoral nail anti-rotation of helical blade in unstable intertrochanteric fracture. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 21(3 Suppl): 6-11, 2017

Acetabular perforation after medial migration of the helical blade through the femoral head after treatment of an unstable trochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): a case report. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 25(9): E86, 2011