+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Morphologically poor blastocysts could affect the implantation rate of a morphologically good blastocyst during a double-blastocyst transfer for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures



Morphologically poor blastocysts could affect the implantation rate of a morphologically good blastocyst during a double-blastocyst transfer for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures



Reproductive Medicine and Biology 17(3): 249-254



Increasing the number of transferred blastocysts sometimes is selected for patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF). To confirm this strategy, the pregnancy rates (PRs) were compared among the groups who had transferred either a single morphologically good blastocyst (MGB group), double blastocysts with both a MGB and a morphologically poor blastocyst (MGB + MPB group), or a double-BT with 2 MGBs (two-MGB group). This study was performed between April, 2009 and September, 2014, including 634 cycles for 354 patients with RIF. All the patients received cryopreserved blastocysts in either hormone replacement or natural ovulatory cycles. The included MGBs were at more than the Gardner grade 3BB stage. The PR and implantation rates (IRs) among the three groups were statistically evaluated by the chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at P < .01. Although the PRs were similar in these three groups, the IR in the MGB + MPB group was significantly lower than that of the MGB group. The rate in the two-MGB group also was significantly lower than that of the MGB group. A double-BT with a MGB and a MPB does not increase the pregnancy rate, compared with a single-BT with a MGB among patients with RIF.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065332193

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30013425

DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12097


Related references

Autologous embryo-cumulus cells co-culture and blastocyst transfer in repeated implantation failures: a collaborative prospective randomized study. Zygote 20(2): 173-180, 2012

Cumulative live birth rate after fresh elective single blastocyst transfer and subsequent frozen single blastocyst transfer compared to initial fresh double blastocysts transfer in women aged 40-43 years. Fertility and Sterility 106(3): E87-E88, 2016

Prospective evaluation of blastocyst stage transfer vs. zygote intrafallopian tube transfer in patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertility & Sterility 77(5): 971-977, 2002

Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: Towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertility & Sterility 73(6): 1155-1158, 2000

Pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated implantation failures after intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI). Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 9: 99, 2011

The effect of age on implementing only vitrified blastocyst transfer (VFBT) cycles and the use of euploid blastocysts (BL) to optimize implantation and single embryo transfer (SET). Fertility and Sterility 102(3): E70-E71, 2014

Blastocyst vitrification versus slow freeze: a retrospective comparison of blastocyst survival, expansion and implantation rate. Fertility and Sterility 100(3): S182-S183, 2013

Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rates compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles--time for a new embryo transfer strategy?. Fertility and Sterility 95(5): 1691-1695, 2011

High implantation and pregnancy rates with transfer of human blastocysts developed in preimplantation stage one and blastocyst media. Fertility and Sterility 70(4): 659-663, 1998

Blastocyst development rate influences implantation and live birth rates of similarly graded euploid blastocysts. Fertility and Sterility 110(1): 95-102.E1, 2018

Cumulative live birth rate following elective single blastocyst transfer compared with double blastocyst transfer in women aged 40 years and over. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 35(6): 733-738, 2017

Dramatic declines in implantation and pregnancy rates in patients who undergo repeated cycles of in vitro fertilization with blastocyst transfer after one or more failed attempts. Fertility & Sterility 76(3): 538-542, 2001

Zygote intrafallopian tube transfer versus intrauterine cleavage or blastocyst stage transfer after intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles in patients with repeated implantation failure: A prospective follow-up study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 41(11): 1779-1784, 2016

Advanced scheduling for zygote intrafallopian transfer is possible via the use of a hormone replacement cycle for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 290(5): 1031-1035, 2015

Endometrial thickness as a predictor of the reproductive outcomes in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles: A retrospective cohort study of 1512 IVF cycles with morphologically good-quality blastocyst. Medicine 97(4): E9689, 2018