+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Permanent Paddle-lead Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation



Permanent Paddle-lead Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation



Cureus 10(5): E2645



Objectives A significant number of chronic pain patients rely on spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treatment of their intractable pain. A screening trial using percutaneous electrodes is an integral step for predicting a successful treatment course with a permanent SCS system. Most of these trials are performed in an outpatient ambulatory surgical center and some in the office setting. However, there are select patients who are considered poor candidates for percutaneous trials. We present the initial report of patients who have received surgical implantation of permanent paddle-leads for SCS trials at our institution and show that this was a safe and effective alternative for our patients who could not undergo percutaneous trials.  Methods We retrospectively reviewed the hospital charts of 12 patients who underwent permanent surgically-implanted paddle-lead trials from 2014 to 2017. Success was considered positive with a 50% reduction in pain rating. If positive, patients were brought back to the operating room to have the implanted leads connected to an internalized pulse generator.    Results All 12 patients met the criteria for a successful trial. Only one patient had his SCS system surgically removed after nine months. None of our patients reported or returned with paddle-lead migrations or infections.  Conclusions We report that surgically-implanted paddle-lead trials were a safe and effective alternative to percutaneous trials in our patients who were deemed poor candidates for percutaneous trials. No complications occurred and all of our patients received a second surgery for internalization of the SCS system. Patients who have previously failed percutaneous trials may be false-negatives to SCS.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065399559

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30034967

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2645


Related references

Compression of Thoracic Spinal Cord with Decreased Cerebrospinal Fluid Space After Implantation of Paddle Lead Spinal Cord Stimulation at T9: A Three-Dimensional Myelographic Computed Tomography Study. World Neurosurgery 118: E323-E334, 2018

Modeling the impact of spinal cord stimulation paddle lead position on impedance, stimulation threshold, and activation region. Conference Proceedings 2015: 5801-5804, 2015

Surgical paddle-lead placement for screening trials of spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation 17(4): 346-8; Discussion 348, 2014

Cervical spinal cord stimulation with 5-column paddle lead in Raynaud's disease. Pain Physician 15(4): 303-309, 2012

A Temporary vs. Permanent Anchored Percutaneous Lead Trial of Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Comparison of Patient Outcomes and Adverse Events. Neuromodulation 21(5): 508-512, 2018

Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain: causes of long-term paddle-lead failure. Neuromodulation 11(4): 282-285, 2008

Significant cephalad paddle-lead migration after lumbar spinal cord stimulation implant. Neuromodulation 17(4): 385, 2014

Multimodal, Intraoperative Monitoring during Paddle Lead Placement for Cervicothoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 93(4): 271-281, 2015

Paddle lead cervical spinal cord stimulation for failed neck surgery syndrome. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 115(10): 2254-2256, 2013

Percutaneous implanted paddle lead for spinal cord stimulation: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. Neuromodulation 15(4): 402-407, 2012

Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain. Journal of Pain Research 7: 465-470, 2014

Computational modeling analysis of a spinal cord stimulation paddle lead reveals broad, gapless dermatomal coverage. Conference Proceedings 2014: 6254-6257, 2014

Epidural spinal cord stimulation with a multiple electrode paddle lead is effective in treating intractable low back pain. Neuromodulation 4(2): 59-66, 2001

Outcomes of percutaneous and paddle lead implantation for spinal cord stimulation: a comparative analysis of complications, reoperation rates, and health-care costs. Neuromodulation 16(5): 418, 2014

The Incidence of Spinal Cord Injury in Implantation of Percutaneous and Paddle Electrodes for Spinal Cord Stimulation. Neuromodulation 19(1): 85-90, 2016