+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Priority setting for health in the context of devolution in Kenya: implications for health equity and community-based primary care



Priority setting for health in the context of devolution in Kenya: implications for health equity and community-based primary care



Health Policy and Planning 33(6): 729-742



Devolution changes the locus of power within a country from central to sub-national levels. In 2013, Kenya devolved health and other services from central government to 47 new sub-national governments (known as counties). This transition seeks to strengthen democracy and accountability, increase community participation, improve efficiency and reduce inequities. With changing responsibilities and power following devolution reforms, comes the need for priority-setting at the new county level. Priority-setting arises as a consequence of the needs and demand for healthcare resources exceeding the resources available, resulting in the need for some means of choosing between competing demands. We sought to explore the impact of devolution on priority-setting for health equity and community health services. We conducted key informant and in-depth interviews with health policymakers, health providers and politicians from 10 counties (n = 269 individuals) and 14 focus group discussions with community members based in 2 counties (n = 146 individuals). Qualitative data were analysed using the framework approach. We found Kenya's devolution reforms were driven by the need to demonstrate responsiveness to county contexts, with positive ramifications for health equity in previously neglected counties. The rapidity of the process, however, combined with limited technical capacity and guidance has meant that decision-making and prioritization have been captured and distorted for political and power interests. Less visible community health services that focus on health promotion, disease prevention and referral have been neglected within the prioritization process in favour of more tangible curative health services. The rapid transition in power carries a degree of risk of not meeting stated objectives. As Kenya moves forward, decision-makers need to address the community health gap and lay down institutional structures, processes and norms which promote health equity for all Kenyans.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065435400

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29846599

DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czy043


Related references

Healthcare equity analysis: applying the Tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in Kenya. International Journal for Equity in Health 18(1): 65, 2019

"Sometimes it is difficult for us to stand up and change this": an analysis of power within priority-setting for health following devolution in Kenya. Bmc Health Services Research 18(1): 906, 2018

Integration of mental health into primary care and community health working in Kenya: context, rationale, coverage and sustainability. Mental Health in Family Medicine 7(1): 37-47, 2010

Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 12: 18, 2014

The second phase of priority setting Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care Fairness as a problem of love and the heart: a clinician's perspective on priority setting Israel's basic basket of health services: the importance of being explicitly implicit. BMJ 317(7164): 1000-1007, 1998

Health dynamics: implications for efficiency and equity in priority setting. Value in Health 14(2): 387-389, 2011

Economic evaluation in primary health care: the case of the western Kenya community based health care project. Index to Theses Accepted for Higher Degrees in the Universities of Great Britain and Ireland 36(1): p.83, 1987

Economic evaluation in primary health care: the case of Western Kenya community based health care project. Social Science and Medicine 18(5): 375-385, 1984

Health Sector Reforms: Implications for Sexual and Reproductive Health Services || Objectivity in Priority Setting Tools in Reproductive Health: Context and the Daly. Reproductive Health Matters 10(20): 38-46, 2002

Comprehensive review of the evidence regarding the effectiveness of community-based primary health care in improving maternal, neonatal and child health: 5. equity effects for neonates and children. Journal of Global Health 7(1): 010905, 2017

A student-facilitated community-based support group initiative for Mental Health Care users in a Primary Health Care setting. Health Sa Gesondheid 22: 307-315, 2017

How Equity-Oriented Health Care Affects Health: Key Mechanisms and Implications for Primary Health Care Practice and Policy. Milbank Quarterly 96(4): 635-671, 2018

User charges and priority setting in health care: balancing equity and efficiency. Journal of Health Economics 24(5): 1018-1029, 2005

Addressing social determinants of health by integrating assessment of caregiver-child attachment into community based primary health care in urban Kenya. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9(10): 3588-3598, 2013

Understanding the provision of palliative care in the context of primary health care: qualitative research findings from a pilot study in a community setting in Chile. Journal of Palliative Care 25(4): 275-283, 2009