+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes



Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes



Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 11(15): 1437-1449



The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients deferred from coronary revascularization on the basis of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in stable angina pectoris (SAP) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Assessment of coronary stenosis severity with pressure guidewires is recommended to determine the need for myocardial revascularization. The safety of deferral of coronary revascularization in the pooled per-protocol population (n = 4,486) of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularisation) and iFR-SWEDEHEART (Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris or Acute Coronary Syndrome) randomized clinical trials was investigated. Patients were stratified according to revascularization decision making on the basis of iFR or FFR and to clinical presentation (SAP or ACS). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization at 1 year. Coronary revascularization was deferred in 2,130 patients. Deferral was performed in 1,117 patients (50%) in the iFR group and 1,013 patients (45%) in the FFR group (p < 0.01). At 1 year, the MACE rate in the deferred population was similar between the iFR and FFR groups (4.12% vs. 4.05%; fully adjusted hazard ratio: 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.72 to 1.79; p = 0.60). A clinical presentation with ACS was associated with a higher MACE rate compared with SAP in deferred patients (5.91% vs. 3.64% in ACS and SAP, respectively; fully adjusted hazard ratio: 0.61 in favor of SAP; 95% confidence interval: 0.38 to 0.99; p = 0.04). Overall, deferral of revascularization is equally safe with both iFR and FFR, with a low MACE rate of about 4%. Lesions were more frequently deferred when iFR was used to assess physiological significance. In deferred patients presenting with ACS, the event rate was significantly increased compared with SAP at 1 year.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065494886

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30093050

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.05.029


Related references

Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 11(23): 2434, 2018

Association between fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio and dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Eurointervention 13(16): 1959-1966, 2017

Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: An Analysis Using Doppler-Derived Coronary Flow Measurements. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 10(24): 2514-2524, 2017

Clinical outcome in patients with intermediate or equivocal left main coronary artery disease after deferral of surgical revascularization on the basis of fractional flow reserve measurements. American Heart Journal 152(1): 156.E1-9, 2006

Outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes and moderate coronary lesions undergoing deferral of revascularization based on fractional flow reserve assessment. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 68(4): 544-548, 2006

Revisiting the Optimal Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Thresholds for Predicting the Physiological Significance of Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions 11(12): E007041-E007041, 2018

Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio and non-invasive coronary flow reserve. Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie 65(5): 380-381, 2016

Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and non-invasive coronary flow reserve. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 33(7): 999-1007, 2016

The impact of coronary chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention upon donor vessel fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio: Implications for physiology-guided PCI in patients with CTO. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 92(3): E139-E148, 2018

Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio for the physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis in the catheterization laboratory: Practical tips. Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angeiologie 66(1): 32-41, 2016

Study of diagnostic efficiencies of pressure indices (rest pd/pa, instantaneous wave free ratio, contrast fractional flow reserve) against fractional flow reserve 0.80 in intermediate coronary lesions. Indian Heart Journal 70: S71-S72, 2018

Non-invasive instantaneous wave-free ratio using coronary CT angiography: diagnostic performance for evaluation of ischaemia-causing coronary stenosis confirmed by invasive fractional flow reserve. Clinical Radiology 73(11): 983.E15-983.E22, 2018

TCT-515 Prognostic implications of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and resting distal-to-aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) compared with fractional flow reserve (FFR). A 10-year follow-up study after deferral of revascularization. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 68(18): B207-B208, 2016

Coronary Flow Reserve in the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio/Fractional Flow Reserve Era: Too Valuable to Be Neglected. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 11(15): 1434-1436, 2018

Reconciling poststenotic pressure with hyperemic flow: comparing coronary flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions 7(4): 432-434, 2015