+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Sex and Race Differences in Lifetime Risk of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction



Sex and Race Differences in Lifetime Risk of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction



Circulation 137(17): 1814-1823



Lifetime risk of heart failure has been estimated to range from 20% to 46% in diverse sex and race groups. However, lifetime risk estimates for the 2 HF phenotypes, HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), are not known. Participant-level data from 2 large prospective cohort studies, the CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study) and MESA (Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), were pooled, excluding individuals with prevalent HF at baseline. Remaining lifetime risk estimates for HFpEF (EF ≥45%) and HFrEF (EF <45%) were determined at different index ages with the use of a modified Kaplan-Meier method with mortality and the other HF subtype as competing risks. We included 12 417 participants >45 years of age (22.2% blacks, 44.8% men) who were followed up for median duration of 11.6 years with 2178 overall incident HF events with 561 HFrEF events and 726 HFpEF events. At the index age of 45 years, the lifetime risk for any HF through 90 years of age was higher in men than women (27.4% versus 23.8%). Among HF subtypes, the lifetime risk for HFrEF was higher in men than women (10.6% versus 5.8%). In contrast, the lifetime risk for HFpEF was similar in men and women. In race-stratified analyses, lifetime risk for overall HF was higher in nonblacks than blacks (25.9% versus 22.4%). Among HF subtypes, the lifetime risk for HFpEF was higher in nonblacks than blacks (11.2% versus 7.7%), whereas that for HFrEF was similar across the 2 groups. Among participants with antecedent myocardial infarction before HF diagnosis, the remaining lifetime risks for HFpEF and HFrEF were up to 2.5-fold and 4-fold higher, respectively, compared with those without antecedent myocardial infarction. Lifetime risks for HFpEF and HFrEF vary by sex, race, and history of antecedent myocardial infarction. These insights into the distribution of HF risk and its subtypes could inform the development of targeted strategies to improve population-level HF prevention and control.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065508485

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29352072

DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.117.031622


Related references

Arterial Stiffness and Risk of Overall Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Health ABC Study (Health, Aging, and Body Composition). Hypertension 69(2): 267-274, 2016

Sex differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in elderly patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (I-PRESERVE) trial. Circulation. Heart Failure 5(5): 571-578, 2012

Short and long-term prognostic value of hyponatremia in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction versus reduced ejection fraction: An analysis of the Korean Acute Heart Failure registry. International Journal of Cardiology 248: 239-245, 2017

Effects of exercise on left ventricular systolic and diastolic properties in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction versus heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction. Circulation. Heart Failure 6(3): 508-516, 2013

Age-dependent differences in clinical phenotype and prognosis in heart failure with mid-range ejection compared with heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Clinical Research in Cardiology 2019, 2019

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction has a better long-term prognosis than heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in old patients in a 5-year follow-up retrospective study. International Journal of Cardiology 232: 86-92, 2017

Circulating levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor 2 are increased in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction relative to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: evidence for a divergence in pathophysiology. Plos One 9(6): E99495, 2015

Risk factors for rehospitalization in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with reduced ejection fraction. Heart and Vessels 30(5): 595-603, 2016

Heart failure with normal ejection fraction, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, diastolic heart failure, or huff-puff: time for a new taxonomy for hypertensive-metabolic heart failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure 20(10): 779-781, 2015

Association Between HIV Infection and the Risk of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Preserved Ejection Fraction in the Antiretroviral Therapy Era: Results From the Veterans Aging Cohort Study. JAMA Cardiology 2(5): 536-546, 2017

New drugs and devices in the pipeline for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction versus heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Current Heart Failure Reports 11(4): 374-381, 2015

UNCERTAINTIES PAGE: Should treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction differ from that for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?. BMJ 341(7770): 453-455, 2010

Different impact of elevated heart rate on cardiovascular events between heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and preserved ejection fraction - a report from the CHART-2 study. European Heart Journal 34(Suppl 1): 1940-1940, 2013

Heart Failure Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients Benefit From Heart Failure Reduced Ejection Fraction Guidelines. Journal of Cardiac Failure 21(8): S73-S74, 2015

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a precursor of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction or a distinct syndrome?. International Journal of Cardiology 149(1): 139-140, 2011