EurekaMag
+ Translate
+ Most Popular
Gaucher's disease;thirty-two years experience at Siriraj Hospital
A study of Macrobathra Meyrick from China (Lepidoptera, Cosmopterigidae)
First occurrence in ores of tetragonal chalcocite
Effects of trace element nutrition on sleep patterns in adult women
N.Z. range management guidelines. 2. Design of grazing management systems for tussock country
A case of lipoma of the esophagus
A revision of world Acanthosomatidae (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): keys to and descriptions of subfamilies, tribes and genera, with designation of types
Life history of the coronate scyphozoan Linuche unguiculata (Swartz, 1788)
Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds
Mutagenicity studies on two chromium(III) coordination compounds
The formation of the skeleton. I. Growth of a long bone. 1st appearance of a center of calcification
Leucopenia and abnormal liver function in travellers on malaria chemoprophylaxis
The joint commission: four key root causes loom large in sentinel event data
Treatment of vitiligo with topical 15% lactic acid solution in combination with ultra violet-A
Behaviour of dairy cows within three hours after feed supply: I. Influence of housing type and time elapsing after feed supply
Observations of the propagation velocity and formation mechanism of burst fractures caused by gunshot
Management and control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Lebanon: results from the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS)
The diet composition and nutritional knowledge of patients with anorexia nervosa
Physoporella croatica Herak, 1958 of the Slovak karst Anisian (Slovakia, the West Carpathians Mts.)
Bright lights, big noise. How effective are vehicle warning systems?
Ein Plesiosaurier-Rest mit Magensteinen aus mittlerem Lias von Quedlinburg
Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis in patients with sterility
Monster soup: the microscope and Victorian fantasy
Preliminary tests with residual sprays against poultry lice
Duration of the life of plants in phylogeny

Sharpening the focus: differentiating between focus groups for patient engagement vs. qualitative research


Sharpening the focus: differentiating between focus groups for patient engagement vs. qualitative research



Research Involvement and Engagement 4: 19



ISSN/ISBN: 2056-7529

PMID: 29983994

DOI: 10.1186/s40900-018-0102-6

Patient engagement is an opportunity for people with experience of a health-related issue to contribute to research on that issue. The Canadian Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) highlights patient engagement as an important part of health research. Patient engagement, however, is a new concept for many researchers and research ethics boards, and it can be difficult to understand the differences between patient engagement activities and research activities. Focus groups are one example of how research and patient engagement activities are often confused.We distinguish these two types of activities by using different terms for each. We use focus groups to refer to research activities, and discussion groups to refer to patient engagement activities. In focus groups, researchers collect data by speaking with a group of research subjects about their experiences. Researchers use this information to answer research questions and share their findings in academic journals and gatherings. In patient engagement, discussion groups are a way for patients to help plan research projects. Their contributions are not treated as research data, but instead they help make decisions that shape the research process. We have found that using different language to refer to each type of activity has led to improved clarity in research planning and research ethics submissions. Background In patient-oriented research (POR), focus groups can be used as a method in both qualitative research and in patient engagement. Canadian health systems researchers and research ethics boards (REBs), however, are often unaware of the key differences to consider when using focus groups for these two distinct purposes. Furthermore, no one has clearly established how using focus groups for these two purposes should be differentiated in the context of Canada's Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR), which emphasizes appropriate patient engagement as a fundamental component of POR. Body Researchers and staff in the Maritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit refer to focus groups in patient engagement as discussion groups for clarity, and have developed internal guidelines to encourage their appropriate use. In this paper, the guidelines comparing and contrasting the design and conduct of focus groups and of discussion groups is described, including: the theoretical framework for each; the need for research ethics board review approval; identifying participants; collecting and analyzing data; ensuring rigour; and disseminating results. Conclusion The MSSU guidelines address an important and current methodological challenge in patient-oriented research, which will benefit Canadian and international health systems researchers, patients, and institutional REBs.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065510139

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Methodological Aspects of Focus Groups in Health Research: Results of Qualitative Interviews With Focus Group Moderators. Global Qualitative Nursing Research 3: 2333393616630466, 2016

Focus groups : a useful qualitative method for educational research ? - Méthode qualitative pour la recherche en éducation. British Educational Research Journal 23(2): 209-224, 1997

Focus groups for qualitative research. Hospital Guest Relations Report 2(3): 7-10, 1987

Focus groups: a qualitative method complementing quantitative research for studying culturally diverse groups. Education for Health 13(1): 91-95, 2000

Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. Bmj 311(7000): 299-302, 1995

Psy59 using Patient Focus Groups to Inform Economic Modeling: Experience from a Hemophilia Patient Focus Group. Value in Health 13(3): A216-A217, 2010

Focus groups--presentation of a qualitative research method. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening: Tidsskrift for Praktisk Medicin Ny Raekke 111(26): 3194-3196, 1991

The use of Facebook for virtual asynchronous focus groups in qualitative research. Contemporary Nurse 54(1): 26-34, 2018

Focus groups as a qualitative method for crosscultural research in social gerontology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 10(1-2): 7-20, 1995

Zooming into Focus Groups: Strategies for Qualitative Research in the Era of Social Distancing. Ats Scholar 2(2): 176-184, 2021

The Contested Terrain of Focus Groups, Lived Experience, and Qualitative Research Traditions. Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing: Jognn 44(5): 565-566, 2015

Qualitative adolescent health research - focus groups: a rural South African example. Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health 16(2): 117-125, 2004

The use of group support systems in focus groups: Information technology meets qualitative research. Computers in Human Behavior 23(5): 2113-2132, 2007

Mixed Methods in Prostate Cancer Prevention and Service Utilization Planning: Combining Focus Groups, Survey Research, and Community Engagement. Social Work in Public Health 32(4): 254-272, 2017

Focus on satisfaction. Using patient focus groups. Mgma Connexion 3(1): 32-33, 2003