+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The genetic network of greater sage-grouse: Range-wide identification of keystone hubs of connectivity



The genetic network of greater sage-grouse: Range-wide identification of keystone hubs of connectivity



Ecology and Evolution 8(11): 5394-5412



Genetic networks can characterize complex genetic relationships among groups of individuals, which can be used to rank nodes most important to the overall connectivity of the system. Ranking allows scarce resources to be guided toward nodes integral to connectivity. The greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) is a species of conservation concern that breeds on spatially discrete leks that must remain connected by genetic exchange for population persistence. We genotyped 5,950 individuals from 1,200 greater sage-grouse leks distributed across the entire species' geographic range. We found a small-world network composed of 458 nodes connected by 14,481 edges. This network was composed of hubs-that is, nodes facilitating gene flow across the network-and spokes-that is, nodes where connectivity is served by hubs. It is within these hubs that the greatest genetic diversity was housed. Using indices of network centrality, we identified hub nodes of greatest conservation importance. We also identified keystone nodes with elevated centrality despite low local population size. Hub and keystone nodes were found across the entire species' contiguous range, although nodes with elevated importance to network-wide connectivity were found more central: especially in northeastern, central, and southwestern Wyoming and eastern Idaho. Nodes among which genes are most readily exchanged were mostly located in Montana and northern Wyoming, as well as Utah and eastern Nevada. The loss of hub or keystone nodes could lead to the disintegration of the network into smaller, isolated subnetworks. Protecting both hub nodes and keystone nodes will conserve genetic diversity and should maintain network connections to ensure a resilient and viable population over time. Our analysis shows that network models can be used to model gene flow, offering insights into its pattern and process, with application to prioritizing landscapes for conservation.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065586537

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29938061

DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4056


Related references

Range-wide connectivity of priority areas for Greater Sage-Grouse: Implications for long-term conservation from graph theory. Condor 119(1): 44-57, 2017

Range-wide patterns of greater sage-grouse persistence. Diversity and Distributions 14(6): 983-994, 2008

Spatial and temporal variation in the range-wide cyclic dynamics of greater sage-grouse. Oecologia 185(4): 687-698, 2017

Modeling ecological minimum requirements for distribution of greater sage-grouse leks: implications for population connectivity across their western range, U.S.A. Ecology and Evolution 3(6): 1539-1551, 2013

A multilocus population genetic survey of the greater sage-grouse across their range. Molecular Ecology 14(5): 1293-1310, 2005

Quantifying functional connectivity: The role of breeding habitat, abundance, and landscape features on range-wide gene flow in sage-grouse. Evolutionary Applications 11(8): 1305-1321, 2018

Landscape characteristics influencing the genetic structure of greater sage-grouse within the stronghold of their range: a holistic modeling approach. Ecology and Evolution 5(10): 1955-1969, 2015

Population structure and genetic diversity of greater sage-grouse Centrocercus urophasianus in fragmented landscapes at the northern edge of their range. Conservation Genetics 12(2): 527-542, 2011

A flexible approach for assessing functional landscape connectivity, with application to greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Plos one 8(12): E82271, 2013

Greater sage-grouse winter habitat use on the eastern edge of their range. Journal of Wildlife Management 77(3): 486-494, 2013

Long-range visibility of greater sage grouse leks: a GIS-based analysis. Animal Behaviour 67 pt6: 27-32, 2004

Society for Range Management Issue Paper: Ecology and Management of Sage-Grouse and Sage-Grouse Habitat--A Reply. Rangelands 28(3): 3-7, 2006

Extending Conifer Removal and Landscape Protection Strategies from Sage-grouse to Songbirds, a Range-Wide Assessment. Rangeland Ecology & Management 70(1): 95-105, 2017

Hierarchical spatial genetic structure in a distinct population segment of greater sage-grouse. Conservation Genetics 15(6): 1299-1311, 2014

Fine-scale genetic structure among greater sage-grouse leks in central Nevada. Bmc Evolutionary Biology 16(1): 127, 2016