+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The null hypothesis of GSEA, and a novel statistical model for competitive gene set analysis



The null hypothesis of GSEA, and a novel statistical model for competitive gene set analysis



Bioinformatics 33(9): 1271-1277



Competitive gene set analysis intends to assess whether a specific set of genes is more associated with a trait than the remaining genes. However, the statistical models assumed to date to underly these methods do not enable a clear cut formulation of the competitive null hypothesis. This is a major handicap to the interpretation of results obtained from a gene set analysis. This work presents a hierarchical statistical model based on the notion of dependence measures, which overcomes this problem. The two levels of the model naturally reflect the modular structure of many gene set analysis methods. We apply the model to show that the popular GSEA method, which recently has been claimed to test the self-contained null hypothesis, actually tests the competitive null if the weight parameter is zero. However, for this result to hold strictly, the choice of the dependence measures underlying GSEA and the estimators used for it is crucial. bdebrabant@health.sdu.dk. Supplementary material is available at Bioinformatics online.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 065599877

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 28453686


Related references

The null hypothesis of GSEA, and a novel statistical model for competitive gene set analysis. Bioinformatics, 2017

Null hypothesis in studies on plant communities i. null model research procedure statistical analysis of results. Ekologia polska 36(3-4): 471-484, 1988

Perspectives on the Use of Null Hypothesis Statistical Testing. Part II: Is Null Hypothesis Statistical Testing an Irregular Bulk of Masonry?. Educational and Psychological Measurement 77(4): 613-615, 2017

Perspectives on the Use of Null Hypothesis Statistical Testing. Part III: The Various Nuts and Bolts of Statistical and Hypothesis Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement 77(5): 816-818, 2017

What role should null-hypothesis significance tests have in statistical education and hypothesis falsification?. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22(9): 445, 2007

The null hypothesis significance test in health sciences research (1995-2006): statistical analysis and interpretation. Bmc Medical Research Methodology 10: 44, 2011

Perspectives on the Use of Null Hypothesis Statistical Testing. Part I: The Mighty Frames of Scientific and Statistical Inference. Educational and Psychological Measurement 77(3): 471-474, 2017

Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests. Psychological Methods 6(4): 371-386, 2001

Statistical challenges in null model analysis. Oikos 121(2): 171-180, 2012

Proposition of a null hypothesis model for the analysis of results in experiments of group consensus. Quality and Quantity 13(4): 339-350, 1979

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) for interpreting gene expression profiles. Current Bioinformatics 2(2): 133-137, 2007

On Some Assumptions of the Null Hypothesis Statistical Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement 77(3): 507-528, 2017

In criticism of the null hypothesis statistical test. American Psychologist 53(7): 798-799, 1998

Statistical power and accepting the null hypothesis. Animal Behaviour 46(5): 1012, 1993

In praise of the null hypothesis statistical test. American Psychologist 52(1): 15-24, 1997