+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The South African English Smartphone Digits-in-Noise Hearing Test: Effect of Age, Hearing Loss, and Speaking Competence



The South African English Smartphone Digits-in-Noise Hearing Test: Effect of Age, Hearing Loss, and Speaking Competence



Ear and Hearing 39(4): 656-663



This study determined the effect of hearing loss and English-speaking competency on the South African English digits-in-noise hearing test to evaluate its suitability for use across native (N) and non-native (NN) speakers. A prospective cross-sectional cohort study of N and NN English adults with and without sensorineural hearing loss compared pure-tone air conduction thresholds to the speech reception threshold (SRT) recorded with the smartphone digits-in-noise hearing test. A rating scale was used for NN English listeners' self-reported competence in speaking English. This study consisted of 454 adult listeners (164 male, 290 female; range 16 to 90 years), of whom 337 listeners had a best ear four-frequency pure-tone average (4FPTA; 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) of ≤25 dB HL. A linear regression model identified three predictors of the digits-in-noise SRT, namely, 4FPTA, age, and self-reported English-speaking competence. The NN group with poor self-reported English-speaking competence (≤5/10) performed significantly (p < 0.01) poorer than the N and NN (≥6/10) groups on the digits-in-noise test. Screening characteristics of the test improved with separate cutoff values depending on English-speaking competence for the N and NN groups (≥6/10) and NN group alone (≤5/10). Logistic regression models, which include age in the analysis, showed a further improvement in sensitivity and specificity for both groups (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.962 and 0.903, respectively). Self-reported English-speaking competence had a significant influence on the SRT obtained with the smartphone digits- in-noise test. A logistic regression approach considering SRT, self-reported English-speaking competence, and age as predictors of best ear 4FPTA >25 dB HL showed that the test can be used as an accurate hearing screening tool for N and NN English speakers. The smartphone digits-in-noise test, therefore, allows testing in a multilingual population familiar with English digits using dynamic cutoff values that can be chosen according to self-reported English-speaking competence and age.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065615491

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29189432

DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000522


Related references

Development and validation of a smartphone-based digits-in-noise hearing test in South African English. International Journal of Audiology 55(7): 405-411, 2016

Norms for the hearing in noise test: The influence of spatial separation, hearing loss, and English language experience on speech reception thresholds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92(4): 2385-2385, 1992

Knowledge and attitudes of a group of South African mine workers towards noise induced hearing loss and the use of hearing protective devices. South African Journal of Communication Disorders 41: 37-47, 1994

Using the Digits-In-Noise Test to Estimate Age-Related Hearing Loss. Ear and Hearing 37(5): 508-513, 2018

Occupational noise-induced hearing loss in South African large-scale mines: exploring hearing conservation programmes as complex interventions embedded in a realist approach. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2018: 1-9, 2018

Smartphone-based hearing test as an aid in the initial evaluation of unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology and Neuro-Otology 18(4): 201-207, 2014

Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(4 Pt 1): 2395-2405, 2004

The effect of an age-related hearing loss gene (Ahl) on noise-induced hearing loss and cochlear damage from low-frequency noise. Hearing Research 204(1-2): 90-100, 2005

The effects of a hearing education program on recreational noise exposure, attitudes and beliefs toward noise, hearing loss, and hearing protector devices in young adults. Noise and Health 17(78): 253-262, 2015

Prevention of the Evolution of Workers' Hearing Loss from Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Noisy Environments through a Hearing Conservation Program. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 20(1): 43-47, 2016

The effect of masking by noise on word discrimination scores in listeners with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss. Scandinavian Audiology 8(3): 139-143, 1979

A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners. International Journal of Audiology 55(6): 358-365, 2017

Hearing test patterns in noise induced temporary hearing loss human. Journal Of Auditory Research: 63-76, 1967

Noise-induced hearing loss: what South African mineworkers know. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2017: 1-6, 2017

Hearing in noise test in subjects with conductive hearing loss. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 108(12): 937-942, 2010