+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A systematic review on reporting outcomes and outcome measures in trials on synthetic mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: Urgent action is needed to improve quality of research



A systematic review on reporting outcomes and outcome measures in trials on synthetic mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: Urgent action is needed to improve quality of research



Neurourology and Urodynamics 38(2): 509-524



The use of synthetic mesh in pelvic organ prolapse surgery is being closely scrutinized because of serious concerns regarding life-changing complications such as erosion, pain, infection, bleeding, dyspareunia, organ perforation, and urinary problems. Randomized trials and their syntheses in meta-analysis offer a unique opportunity to assess efficacy and safety. However, outcomes and outcome measures need to be consistently selected, collected, and reported across randomized trials to be effectively combined in systematic reviews.Label="AIMS">We evaluated outcome and outcome measure reporting across randomized controlled trials on surgical interventions using synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.Label="METHODS">Systematic review of randomized controlled trials using synthetic mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. The selected studies were evaluated using Jadad and MOMENT criteria. Outcomes and outcome measures were systematically identified and categorized.Label="RESULTS">Seventy-one randomized trials were included. Twenty-four different types of mesh were identified. Included trials reported 110 different outcomes and 60 outcome measures. Erosion (40 trials, 78%), pain (29 trials, 56%), bleeding (31 trials, 61%), and dyspareunia (25 trials, 49%) were the most frequently reported outcomes. The longest follow up was 74 months.Label="CONCLUSIONS">Most randomized trials evaluating surgical interventions using synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse failed to report on clinically important outcomes and to evaluate efficacy and safety over the medium- and long-term. Developing and implementing a minimum data set, known as a core outcome set, in future vaginal prolapse trials could help address these issues.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065706261

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30431183

DOI: 10.1002/nau.23871


Related references

Trials of transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process. Bmj Open 7(12): E017125, 2017

Surgical outcomes and quality of life post-synthetic mesh-augmented repair for pelvic organ prolapse in the Chinese population. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 40(2): 509-514, 2014

A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set. International Urogynecology Journal 29(12): 1727-1745, 2018

A systematic review of reported outcomes and outcome measures in randomized controlled trials on apical prolapse surgery. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 145(1): 4, 2019

The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in pelvic organ prolapse. International Urogynecology Journal 22(9): 1117-1125, 2011

Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows' Pelvic Research Network study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 201(5): 519.E1-8, 2009

Vaginal Obliterative Procedures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 72(3): 175-183, 2017

Does pelvic floor muscle training augment the effect of surgery in women with pelvic organ prolapse? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Neurourology and Urodynamics 35(6): 666-674, 2016

Quality-of-life and behavioral outcome measures in randomized controlled trials of antiepileptic drugs: A systematic review of methodology and reporting standards. Epilepsia 41(11): 1357-1363, 2000

Popularization of tension-free vaginal mesh surgery for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in Japan: a retrospective review of the first 50 procedures performed by a gynecologist. International Journal of Surgery 10(9): 578-580, 2012

Sacrocolpopexy with polyvinylidene fluoride mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: Mid term comparative outcomes with polypropylene mesh. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 220: 74-78, 2018

Sacrocolpopexy with polyvinylidene fluoride mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: Mid term comparative outcomes with polypropylene mesh. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 220: 74-78, 2018

Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Bjog 121(5): 537-547, 2014

Transvaginal mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 33(2): 168-174, 2011

No. 351-Transvaginal Mesh Procedures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 39(11): 1085-1097, 2017