+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Carbohydrate restriction for glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis



Carbohydrate restriction for glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis



Diabetic Medicine 2018



To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes. We searched Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL for the period between 1976 and April 2018. We included randomized controlled trials comparing carbohydrate restriction with a control diet which aimed to maintain or increase carbohydrate intake, and that reported HbA1c as an outcome and reported the amount of carbohydrate consumed during or at the end of the study, with outcomes reported at ≥3 months. We identified 1402 randomized controlled trials, 25 of which met the inclusion criteria, incorporating 2132 participants for the main outcome. Definitions of low carbohydrate varied among the studies. The pooled effect estimate from meta-analysis was a weighted mean difference of -0.09% [95% CI -0.27, 0.08 (P = 0.30); I2 72% (P <0.001)], suggesting no effect on HbA1c of restricting the quantity of carbohydrate. A subgroup analysis of diets containing 50-130 g carbohydrate resulted in a pooled effect estimate of -0.49% [95% CI -0.75, -0.23 (P <0.001); I2 0% (P = 0.56)], suggesting a clinically and statistically significant effect on HbA1c in favour of low-carbohydrate diets in studies of ≤6 months' duration. There was no overall pooled effect on HbA1c in favour of restricting carbohydrate; however, restriction of carbohydrate to 50-130 g per day had beneficial effects on HbA1c in trials up to 6 months. Future randomized controlled trials should be of >12 months' duration, assess pre-study carbohydrate intake, use recognized definitions of low-carbohydrate diets and examine reasons for non-concordance in greater detail. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065718285

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30426553

DOI: 10.1111/dme.13862


Related references

Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Bmj Open Diabetes Research and Care 5(1): E000354, 2017

Does exercise improve glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One 8(3): E58861, 2013

The effect of nurse prescribers on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies 78: 37-43, 2017

Glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus during and after cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One 12(5): E0176941, 2017

Effect of Aloe vera on glycaemic control in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 41(2): 180-188, 2017

Effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions for the treatment of diabetes-specific emotional distress and glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Primary Care Diabetes 2019, 2019

Effect of dietary carbohydrate restriction on glycemic control in adults with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 139: 239-252, 2018

Effectiveness of smartphone technologies on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review with meta-analysis of 17 trials. Obesity Reviews 19(6): 825-838, 2018

Intensive glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials. Bmj 343: D6898, 2012

Intensive glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials. Bmj 343(Nov24 1): D6898-D6898, 2011

Impact of accelerometer and pedometer use on physical activity and glycaemic control in people with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic Medicine 34(5): 612-620, 2017

Telephone follow-up to improve glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Diabetic Medicine 27(11): 1217-1225, 2011

Impact of different training modalities on glycaemic control and blood lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetologia 57(9): 1789-1797, 2015

Psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Bmj 333(7558): 65, 2006

Mobile Phone Text Messaging in Improving Glycaemic Control for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2019, 2019