+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparative organizational research starts with sound measurement: Validity and invariance of Turker's corporate social responsibility scale in five cross-cultural samples



Comparative organizational research starts with sound measurement: Validity and invariance of Turker's corporate social responsibility scale in five cross-cultural samples



Plos one 13(11): E0207331



As organizational research turned its focus to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), interest also grew in the individual's perspective on CSR. When looking for cross-cultural comparisons of the effects of CSR, measurement invariance is of utter importance as a questionnaire might not be equivalent in all investigated samples and thus bias results. We examined a previously published questionnaire assessing different aspects of personal CSR ratings. Factorial validity and measurement invariance was tested by means of confirmatory factor analysis and Bayesian structural equation modeling in five samples (total N = 1120): 2 US-American, 2 German, and 1 English-speaking Indian sample. In an exploratory-confirmatory approach, the originally proposed factor structure was altered to finally comprise four facets of CSR: employee-related CSR, environmental CSR, philanthropy and customer-related CSR. Measurement invariance tests showed evidence for small differences of the English and German version as well as significant divergences of the measurement model in the Indian sample. In conclusion, we show the validity of the questionnaire for a circumscribed Western context but are hesitant about further transfers. Future research on perception of CSR in non-western contexts might depend on new and tailored questionnaires.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065733908

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30452457

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207331


Related references

Cross-cultural validity and measurement invariance of the social physique anxiety scale in five European nations. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 17(6): 703-719, 2007

Cross-cultural validity and measurement invariance of the Organizational Stressor Indicator for Sport Performers (OSI-SP) across three countries. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 27(8): 895-903, 2017

A Cross-cultural Examination of the Noise-sensitivity Scale-short Form: Measurement Invariance Testing between the US and Chinese Samples. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 31(11): 851-854, 2018

Attitudes Towards Gender Roles in Cross-Cultural Surveys: Content Validity and Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance. Social Indicators Research 123(3): 733-751, 2015

Assessing the Implicit Theory of Willpower for Strenuous Mental Activities Scale: Multigroup, across-gender, and cross-cultural measurement invariance and convergent and divergent validity. Psychological Assessment 30(8): 1049-1064, 2018

Measurement validity in cross-cultural comparative research. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 17(3): 211-220, 2008

Factorial Validity and Measurement Invariance of the Slovene Version of the Cultural Intelligence Scale. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1499, 2018

The effects of corporate social responsibility on employees' affective commitment: a cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology 97(6): 1186-1200, 2012

Impact of corporate social responsibility claims on consumer food choice A cross-cultural comparison. 2012

Cross-cultural invariance of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R): comparing UK and US samples. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 35(3): 248-260, 2017

Extending corporate social responsibility research to the human resource management and organizational behavior domains a look to the future. Personnel Psychology 66(4): 805-824, 2013

When Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Meets Organizational Psychology: New Frontiers in Micro-CSR Research, and Fulfilling a Quid Pro Quo through Multilevel Insights. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 520, 2017

Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment 15(1): 36-47, 2008

The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings (PASSES): development, validity, and cross-cultural invariance in young people. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 8(5): 632-653, 2007

How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment: a Psychosocial Process Mediated by Organizational Sense of Community. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 27(4): 241-269, 2015