+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA may have a prognostic role in myocardial bridging



Fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA may have a prognostic role in myocardial bridging



European Radiology 2018



To evaluate the feasibility of fractional flow reserve (cFFR) derivation from coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with myocardial bridging (MB), its relationship with MB anatomical features, and clinical relevance. This retrospective study included 120 patients with MB of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and 41 controls. MB location, length, depth, muscle index, instance, and stenosis rate were measured. cFFR values were compared between superficial MB (≤ 2 mm), deep MB (> 2 mm), and control groups. Factors associated with abnormal cFFR values (≤ 0.80) were analyzed. MB patients demonstrated lower cFFR values in MB and distal segments than controls (all p < 0.05). A significant cFFR difference was only found in the MB segment during systole between superficial (0.94, 0.90-0.96) and deep MB (0.91, 0.83-0.95) (p = 0.018). Abnormal cFFR values were found in 69 (57.5%) MB patients (29 [49.2%] superficial vs. 40 [65.6%] deep; p = 0.069). MB length (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.10; p = 0.001) and systolic stenosis (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07; p = 0.021) were the main predictors for abnormal cFFR, with an area under the curve of 0.774 (95% CI 0.689-0.858; p < 0.001). MB patients with abnormal cFFR reported more typical angina (18.8% vs 3.9%, p = 0.023) than patients with normal values. MB patients showed lower cFFR values than controls. Abnormal cFFR values have a positive association with symptoms of typical angina. MB length and systolic stenosis demonstrate moderate predictive value for an abnormal cFFR value. KEY POINTS: • MB patients showed lower cFFR values than controls. • Abnormal cFFR values have a positive association with typical angina symptoms. • MB length and systolic stenosis demonstrate moderate predictive value for an abnormal cFFR value .

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065790830

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30377794

DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5811-6


Related references

The diagnostic performance of CT-derived fractional flow reserve for evaluation of myocardial ischaemia confirmed by invasive fractional flow reserve: a meta-analysis. Clinical Radiology 70(5): 476-486, 2015

Myocardial perfusion during transient slow-flow in the patient with old vein graft intervention: assessment by serial measurement of pressure-derived fractional flow reserve and thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 60(3): 392-398, 2003

Impact of Right Atrial Pressure on Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements: Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Fractional Flow Reserve in 1,600 Coronary Stenoses. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 9(5): 453-459, 2016

Vessel-specific quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow, myocardial flow reserve and relative flow reserve by means of fused dynamic 13 NH 3 PET and CCTA: Ranges in a low-risk population and abnormality criteria. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2018, 2018

Myocardial bridging and fractional flow reserve. Revista Espanola de Cardiologia 58(9): 1117, 2005

The diagnostic performance of SPECT-MPI to predict functional significant coronary artery disease by fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFR CT ): sub-analysis from ACCURACY and VCT001 studies. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 33(12): 2067-2072, 2017

Comparison of pressure-derived fractional flow reserve with poststenotic coronary flow velocity reserve for prediction of stress myocardial perfusion imaging results. American Heart Journal. 130(4): 723-733, 1995

Comparison of post-stenotic flow velocity reserve and translesional pressure-derived fractional flow reserve for prediction of myocardial perfusion imaging results. Circulation 90(4 PART 2): I226, 1994

Accuracy and usefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve from computed tomographic coronary angiography: comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging, echocardiographic coronary flow reserve, and invasive fractional flow reserve. Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 32(1): 66-71, 2015

Normalisation of abnormal coronary fractional flow reserve associated with myocardial bridging using an intracoronary stent. Heart 83(6): 705-707, 2000

Importance of diastolic fractional flow reserve and dobutamine challenge in physiologic assessment of myocardial bridging. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 42(2): 226-233, July 16, 2003

Deferring coronary stenting for myocardial bridging by fractional flow reserve and optical coherence tomography. Journal of Invasive Cardiology 24(2): E27-E29, 2012

Measurement of fractional flow reserve in a patient with combined myocardial bridging and coronary fixed stenosis. Journal of Cardiology Cases 6(6), 2012

Fractional flow reserve with dobutamine challenge and coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction in symptomatic myocardial bridging. Circulation Journal 78(3): 685-692, 2014

Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve measurements--initial experience with a novel physician-driven algorithm. European Radiology 25(4): 1201-1207, 2015