+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Unmet Needs in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Starting Insulin Therapy with Basal or Premix Insulin in Routine Clinical Practice in Serbia

Unmet Needs in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Starting Insulin Therapy with Basal or Premix Insulin in Routine Clinical Practice in Serbia

Diabetes Therapy 2018

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive disease with declining beta cell function, ultimately necessitating insulin therapy. Timely introduction of adequate insulin improves management of diabetes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the unmet needs in the management of T2DM patients recently initiated on insulin therapy in routine clinical practice in Serbia. The NEED study was a cross-sectional, observational, multicenter, real-world study conducted in Serbia, involving 26 physicians, endocrinologists, treating individuals with T2DM from 17 secondary health care institutions. Study participants were newly initiated with insulin therapy, being treated with basal or premix insulin ± oral antidiabetics (OAD) for 6-12 months. Four hundred one individuals were included in the study between October 2016 and March 2017. The mean age of study patients was 61.8 ± 9.2 years with mean BMI 30.0 ± 5.0 kg/m2, and duration of diabetes, prior to initiation of insulin therapy, was 8.4 ± 5.9 years. A basal insulin regimen was used by 287 (71.6%) and premix insulin by 114 (28.4%) subjects. The average daily dose (39.8 ± 13.9 units premix vs. 26.3 ± 13.5 units basal), dose/kg (0.47 ± 0.15 units/kg premix vs. 0.31 ± 0.17 units/kg basal), and number of injections per day were higher in the premix compared with basal insulin regimen (p < 0.01). The percentage of T2DM participants with at least one unmet need was high (95.8%). The majority of participants had two or three unmet needs. The most common unmet needs were: HbA1c > 7.0% (79.3%), at least one documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (≤ 3.9 mmol/l) event in the previous 3 months (63.8%), and two or more doses of insulin per day (53.1%). The mean individual HbA1c target was 6.8% in the NEED study cohort, with only 16% of participants reaching it. Most participants [281 (70.1%)] experienced symptomatic hypoglycemia. The NEED study showed that new insulin users of either basal or premix HM insulin have many unmet needs in the first 6-12 months of treatment. This confirms that in real-life settings novel insulins should be considered in the management of T2DM to reduce the number of symptomatic hypoglycemic events and reach a better HbA1c level. Sanofi, Serbia.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 065963915

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30450529

DOI: 10.1007/s13300-018-0530-1

Related references

Efficacy of combining insulin glulisine with basal insulin glargine in patients with type I and type 2 diabetes previously on premix insulin therapy. 2007

Basal insulin or premix analogue therapy in type 2 diabetes patients. European Journal of Internal Medicine 18(1): 56-62, 2007

Effectiveness and tolerability of treatment intensification to basal-bolus therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes on previous basal insulin-supported oral therapy with insulin glargine or supplementary insulin therapy with insulin glulisine: the PARTNER observational study. Vascular Health and Risk Management 11: 569-578, 2016

Low risk of severe hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus starting insulin therapy with premixed insulin analogues BID in outpatient settings. International Journal of Clinical Practice 66(11): 1033-1041, 2013

Basal Insulin Dose in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus on Insulin Pumps in Real-Life Clinical Practice: A Single-Center Experience. Advances in Medicine 2018: 1473160, 2018

Optimization of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: beyond basal insulin. Diabetic Medicine 29(7): E13-E20, 2012

Basal and Bolus Insulin Dose Changes after Switching Basal Insulin to Insulin Degludec in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pilot Study. Clinical Drug Investigation 37(9): 845-852, 2017

Starting insulin therapy with basal insulin analog or premix insulin analog in T2DM: a pooled analysis of treat-to-target trials. Current Medical Research and Opinion 26(7): 1621-1628, 2010

Insulin aspart efficacy and safety compared to human soluble insulin and human premix insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 44(Supplement 1): A209, 2001

A stepwise approach to insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and basal insulin treatment failure. Endocrine Practice 17(3): 395-403, 2011

Criteria influencing the choice of starting insulin regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice: baseline data from the Algerian cohort of the A₁chieve study. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 101 Suppl 1: S45-S49, 2014

Effects of biphasic, basal-bolus or basal insulin analogue treatments on carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the randomised Copenhagen Insulin and Metformin Therapy (CIMT) trial. Bmj Open 6(2): E008377, 2016

Comparison of thrice-daily premixed insulin (insulin lispro premix) with basal-bolus (insulin glargine once-daily plus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro) therapy in east Asian patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled with twice-daily premixed insulin: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. Diabetes and Endocrinology 3(4): 254-262, 2016

Effects of switching from prandial premixed insulin therapy to basal plus two times bolus insulin therapy on glycemic control and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drug Design, Development and Therapy 8: 391-396, 2014

Comparison between insulin aspart and soluble human insulin in type 1 diabetes (IDDM) patients treated with basal-bolus insulin therapy: Phase III clinical trial in Japan. Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society 44(10): 799-811, 2001