+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Revisiting the Optimal Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Thresholds for Predicting the Physiological Significance of Coronary Artery Disease



Revisiting the Optimal Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Thresholds for Predicting the Physiological Significance of Coronary Artery Disease



Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions 11(12): E007041



Label="BACKGROUND">There has been a gradual upward creep of revascularization thresholds for both fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), before the clinical outcome trials for both indices. The increase in revascularization that has potentially resulted is at odds with increasing evidence questioning the benefits of revascularizing stable coronary disease. Using an independent invasive reference standard, this study primarily aimed to define optimal thresholds for FFR and iFR and also aimed to compare the performance of iFR, FFR, and resting distal coronary pressure (Pd)/central aortic pressure (Pa).Label="METHODS AND RESULTS">Pd and Pa were measured in 75 patients undergoing coronary angiography±percutaneous coronary intervention with resting Pd/Pa, iFR, and FFR calculated. Doppler average peak flow velocity was simultaneously measured and hyperemic stenosis resistance calculated as hyperemic stenosis resistance=Pa-Pd/average peak flow velocity (using hyperemic stenosis resistance >0.80 mm Hg/cm per second as invasive reference standard). An FFR threshold of 0.75 had an optimum diagnostic accuracy (84%), whereas for iFR this was 0.86 (76%). At these thresholds, the discordance in classification between indices was 11%. The accuracy of contemporary thresholds (FFR, 0.80; iFR, 0.89) was significantly lower (78.7% and 65.3%, respectively) with a 25% rate of discordance. The optimal threshold for Pd/Pa was 0.88 (77.3% accuracy). When comparing indices at optimal thresholds, FFR showed the best diagnostic performance (area under the curve, 0.91 FFR versus 0.79 iFR and 0.77 Pd/Pa, P=0.002).Label="CONCLUSIONS">Contemporary thresholds provide suboptimal diagnostic accuracy compared with an FFR threshold of 0.75 and iFR threshold of 0.86 (cutoffs in derivation studies). Whether more rigorous thresholds would result in selecting populations gaining greater symptom and prognostic benefit needs assessing in future trials of physiology-guided revascularization.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066017777

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30562079

DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.118.007041


Related references

Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio for the physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis in the catheterization laboratory: Practical tips. Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angeiologie 66(1): 32-41, 2017

Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 11(23): 2434, 2018

Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 11(15): 1437-1449, 2018

Association between fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio and dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Eurointervention 13(16): 1959-1966, 2018

Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and non-invasive coronary flow reserve. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 33(7): 999, 2017

Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio and non-invasive coronary flow reserve. Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie 65(5): 380-381, 2016

Instantaneous wave-free ratio to guide coronary revascularisation: physiological framework, validation and differences from fractional flow reserve. Eurointervention 13(4): 450-458, 2017

Study of diagnostic efficiencies of pressure indices (rest pd/pa, instantaneous wave free ratio, contrast fractional flow reserve) against fractional flow reserve 0.80 in intermediate coronary lesions. Indian Heart Journal 70: S71-S72, 2018

Reconciling poststenotic pressure with hyperemic flow: comparing coronary flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions 7(4): 432-434, 2014

Physiological Pattern of Disease Assessed by Pressure-Wire Pullback Has an Influence on Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance. Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions 12(5): E007494, 2019

Coronary Flow Reserve in the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio/Fractional Flow Reserve Era: Too Valuable to Be Neglected. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 11(15): 1434-1436, 2018

VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in EverydaY Practice): a multicenter study in consecutive patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 61(13): 1421-1427, 2013

Validation of Resting Diastolic Pressure Ratio Calculated by a Novel Algorithm and Its Correlation With Distal Coronary Artery Pressure to Aortic Pressure, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, and Fractional Flow Reserve. Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions 11(12): E006911, 2018

TCT-163 Physiologic Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis by Intravascular Ultrasound Radiofrequency Signal Analysis of Blood Speckles: A Comparison with Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 66(15): B59-B60, 2015

Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: An Analysis Using Doppler-Derived Coronary Flow Measurements. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 10(24): 2514-2524, 2017