+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement



Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement



Molecular Ecology Resources 2018



While in recent years environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding surveys have shown great promise as an alternative monitoring method, the integration into existing marine monitoring programs may be confounded by the dispersal of the eDNA signal. Currents and tidal influences could transport eDNA over great distances, inducing false-positive species detection, leading to inaccurate biodiversity assessments and, ultimately, mismanagement of marine environments. In this study, we determined the ability of eDNA metabarcoding surveys to distinguish localized signals obtained from four marine habitats within a small spatial scale (<5 km) subject to significant tidal and along-shore water flow. Our eDNA metabarcoding survey detected 86 genera, within 77 families and across 11 phyla using three established metabarcoding assays targeting fish (16S rRNA gene), crustacean (16S rRNA gene), and eukaryotic (cytochrome oxidase subunit 1) diversity. Ordination and cluster analyses for both taxonomic and OTU datasets show distinct eDNA signals between the sampled habitats, suggesting dispersal of eDNA among habitats was limited. Individual taxa with strong habitat preferences displayed localized eDNA signals in accordance with their respective habitat, whereas taxa known to be less habitat-specific generated more ubiquitous signals. Our data add to evidence that eDNA metabarcoding surveys in marine environments detect a broad range of taxa that are spatially discrete. Our work also highlights that refinement of assay choice is essential to realize the full potential of eDNA metabarcoding surveys in marine biodiversity monitoring programs. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066029949

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30576077

DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12982


Related references

Environmental DNA metabarcoding of wild flowers reveals diverse communities of terrestrial arthropods. Ecology and Evolution 9(4): 1665-1679, 2019

eDNA metabarcoding: a promising method for anuran surveys in highly diverse tropical forests. Molecular Ecology Resources 17(5): 904-914, 2016

Metabarcoding reveals strong spatial structure and temporal turnover of zooplankton communities among marine and freshwater ports. Diversity and Distributions 22(5): 493-504, 2016

Biomonitoring of marine vertebrates in Monterey Bay using eDNA metabarcoding. Plos One 12(4): E0176343, 2017

Next-generation freshwater bioassessment: eDNA metabarcoding with a conserved metazoan primer reveals species-rich and reservoir-specific communities. Royal Society Open Science 3(11): 160635, 2016

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding assays to detect invasive invertebrate species in the Great Lakes. Plos One 12(5): E0177643, 2017

Predicting the Ecological Quality Status of Marine Environments from eDNA Metabarcoding Data Using Supervised Machine Learning. Environmental Science and Technology 51(16): 9118-9126, 2017

Multi-marker eDNA metabarcoding survey to assess the environmental impact of three offshore gas platforms in the North Adriatic Sea (Italy). Marine Environmental Research 2019, 2019

DNA metabarcoding reveals diverse diet of the three-spined stickleback in a coastal ecosystem. Plos One 12(10): E0186929, 2017

Process-based approach reveals directional effects of environmental factors on movement between habitats. Journal of Animal Ecology 80(6): 1299-1304, 2012

Not all are free-living: high-throughput DNA metabarcoding reveals a diverse community of protists parasitizing soil metazoa. Molecular Ecology 24(17): 4556-4569, 2015

Detection and quantification of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato mosquito larvae in experimental aquatic habitats using environmental DNA (eDNA). Wellcome Open Research 3: 26, 2018

eDNA metabarcoding as a new surveillance approach for coastal Arctic biodiversity. Ecology and Evolution 8(16): 7763-7777, 2018

Combined use of eDNA metabarcoding and video surveillance for the assessment of fish biodiversity. Conservation Biology 2018, 2018

Environmental metabarcoding reveals contrasting microbial communities at two poplar phytomanagement sites. Science of the Total Environment 571: 1230-1240, 2018