+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Severity of illness assessment with application of the APACHE IV predicted mortality and outcome trends analysis in an academic cardiac intensive care unit



Severity of illness assessment with application of the APACHE IV predicted mortality and outcome trends analysis in an academic cardiac intensive care unit



Journal of Critical Care 50: 242-246



To assess trends in life support interventions and performance of the automated Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV model at mortality prediction compared with Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score (OASIS) in a contemporary cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). Retrospective analysis of adults (age ≥ 18 years) admitted to CICU from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2015. Temporal trends were assessed with linear regression. Discrimination of each risk score for hospital mortality was assessed with use of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values. Calibration was assessed with Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The study analyzed 10,004 patients. CICU and hospital mortality rates were 5.7% and 9.1%. APACHE IV predicted death had an AUROC of 0.82 (0.81-0.84) for hospital death, compared with 0.79 for OASIS (P < .05). Calibration was better for OASIS than APACHE IV. Increases were observed in CICU and hospital lengths of stay (both P < .001), APACHE IV predicted mortality (P = .007), Charlson Comorbidity Index (P < .001), noninvasive ventilation use (P < .001), and noninvasive ventilation days (P = .02). Contemporary CICU patients are increasingly ill, observed in upward trends in comorbid conditions and life support interventions. APACHE IV predicted death and OASIS showed good discrimination in predicting death in this population. APACHE IV and OASIS may be useful for benchmarking and quality improvement initiatives in the CICU, the former having better discrimination.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066062069

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30612068

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.12.012


Related references

Intensive care unit outcome Objectively scoring severity of patient illness in cardiac versus general surgical ICU mortality. Anesthesiology (Hagerstown) 81(3A): A255, 1994

Independent validation of APACHE II severity of illness score for predicting mortality in patients with breast cancer admitted to the intensive care unit. Cancer 70(2): 497-503, 1992

An analysis of excess mortality not predicted to occur by APACHE III in an Australian level III intensive care unit. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 28(2): 171-177, 2000

Mortality in an intensive care unit: predictive value of APACHE II severity score versus maximum APACHE. Revista Medica de Chile 121(1): 52-58, 1993

APACHE III study design: analytic plan for evaluation of severity and outcome in intensive care unit patients. Development of APACHE III. Critical Care Medicine 17(12 Pt 2): S199-S203, 1989

APACHE III study design: analytic plan for evaluation of severity and outcome in intensive care unit patients. Development of APACHE. Critical Care Medicine 17(12 Pt 2): S181-S185, 1989

Resource utilization and outcome in gravely ill intensive care unit patients with predicted in-hospital mortality rates of 95% or higher by APACHE III scores: the relationship with physician and family expectations. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 80(2): 166-173, 2005

APACHE III study design: analytic plan for evaluation of severity and outcome in intensive care unit patients. Analysis: quality of care. Critical Care Medicine 17(12 Pt 2): S210-S212, 1989

Severity scores in respiratory intensive care: APACHE II predicted mortality better than SAPS II. Respiratory Care 40(10): 1042-1047, 1995

APACHE III study design: analytic plan for evaluation of severity and outcome in intensive care unit patients. Analysis of process. Critical Care Medicine 17(12 Pt 2): S213-S216, 1989

Validation of a severity of illness score (APACHE II) in a surgical intensive care unit. Intensive Care Medicine 15(8): 519-522, 1989

Prediction of outcome in intensive care unit trauma patients: a multicenter study of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), and a 24-hour intensive care unit (ICU) point system. Journal of Trauma 47(2): 324-329, 1999

Cardiac troponin trends and severity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: Are limits properly associated for Intensive Care Unit outcome?. Lung India 33(5): 583-584, 2016

APACHE III study design: analytic plan for evaluation of severity and outcome in intensive care unit patients. Introduction. Critical Care Medicine 17(12 Pt 2): S176-S180, 1989

APACHE III study design: analytic plan for evaluation of severity and outcome in intensive care unit patients. Implications. Critical Care Medicine 17(12 Pt 2): S219-S221, 1989