+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing

Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 77(5): 328-333

The objective of the present study was to study the effect of adaptive image processing on the visibility of anatomical structures in storage phosphor plate (SPP) panoramic images. Three hundred SPP panoramic X-ray radiographs of children and adolescents were used. The radiographs were post-processed using general operator processor (GOP) technology, resulting in both a standard-processed and a GOP-processed radiograph. Four specialists in dental radiology compared the structural image quality of all standard-processed and GOP-processed panorama images for six anatomical structures, using a six-point scale for visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis. For three of the anatomic structures - the root canal space of the mandibular left first premolar, mandibular canal left side and periodontal ligament space of the mandibular right first molar - there was a statistically significant difference to the GOP's advantage. For the three remaining structures - dentino-enamel junction of the maxillary right first molar, crista alveolaris of the mandibular left molar area and floor of maxillary sinus right side - no significant difference between standard processing and GOP processing was obtained. The study demonstrates that it is possible to improve the quality of SPP radiographs and the visibility of anatomical structures by using the GOP technique. Manufacturers' image-processing programs can be further developed, as there is a possibility of improving the diagnostic content of an image with external processing.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066072459

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30623704

DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1556801

Related references

An evaluation of image quality for the assessment of the marginal bone level in panoramic radiography. A comparison of radiographs from different dental clinics. SwedishDentalJournal17(1-2):9, 1993

The effects of compression on the image quality of digital panoramic radiographs. Clinical Oral Investigations 16(3): 719-726, 2012

Clinical evaluation of dose reduction on image quality of panoramic radiographs. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 9(5): 34-41, 2008

Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system. Rofo 156(3): 241-246, 1992

Image quality assessment of pre-processed and post-processed digital panoramic radiographs in paediatric patients with mixed dentition. Imaging Science in Dentistry 48(4): 261-268, 2018

Predicting lower third molar eruption on panoramic radiographs after cephalometric comparison of profile and panoramic radiographs. European Journal of Orthodontics 35(4): 460-466, 2013

Subjective image quality of digital panoramic radiographs displayed on monitor and printed on various hardcopy media. Clinical Oral Investigations 8(1): 25-29, 2004

A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 11(1): E009-E016, 2010

Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality. Imaging Science in Dentistry 43(1): 7, 2013

Image quality and dose differences caused by vendor-specific image processing of neonatal radiographs. Pediatric Radiology 46(11): 1606-1613, 2016

Comparative investigation of subjective image quality of digital intraoral radiographs processed with 3 image-processing algorithms. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 97(6): 762-767, 2004

The consistent image--how to improve the quality of dental radiographs: 2. The image receptor, processing and darkroom/film handling. Dental Update 33(1): 39-40 42, 2006

Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 74(3): 229-235, 2016

Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 32(1): 39-44, 2003

A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system. International Endodontic Journal 42(10): 900-907, 2009