+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluation of the National Research Council (NRC) nutrient requirements for beef cattle: Predicting feedlot performance



Evaluation of the National Research Council (NRC) nutrient requirements for beef cattle: Predicting feedlot performance



Canadian Journal of Animal Science 83(4): 787-792



The accuracy of predicted CowBytes((R)) versus actual dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG) of 407 Hereford x Angus and Charolais x Maine Anjou (445.6 +/- 36 kg) feeder cattle using digestable enery acid detergent fiber (DE) estimated from the (ADF) content [Laboratory analysis method (LAB)] and from values determined in vivo (INVIVO method) was examined. The diet consisted of a 73.3% concentrate diet, 22.0% barley silage, 1.6% molasses, and 3.1% feedlot supplement fed ad libitum (as-fed basis). The calculated DE values of the feed were used to predict the metabolizable energy (ME), net energy of maintenance (NE.), and net energy of gain (NE) of the diet. These energy values were then used in CowBytes((R)) to predict dry matter intake (DMI), ADG, and days on feed (DgbF) necessary to meet targeted quality grade of AA and weights of 522 and 568 kg for the heifers and steers, respectively. There was no effect of gender and prediction method interaction (P > 0.10) on any of the variables measured. There were no (P > 0.05) differences in predicted DMI by either the INVIVO or LAB method but both methods underestimated DMI actually consumed by the cattle by 6.8 and 4.9% (P = 0.007), respectively. Indeed, regression values from these predictive methods and actual DMI were (P < 0.05) different from the one-to-one relationship expected by definition. In spite of the higher actual DMI, the actual ADG of the cattle was 14 and 11% (P = 0.0004) lower than was predicted by either the INVIVO or LAB methods. A possible reason for the lower ADG could be an overestimation of DE of the diet. Thus, if available, users of CowBytes((R)) should use actual DMI from their experience in ration formulation. In addition, the effects of environmental temperature on digestibility of diets should be taken into consideration when using the DE of the diet as determined from in vivo digestibility trials or calculated from chemical analyses in determining the DMI of feedlot cattle.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066172743

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.4141/a03-009


Related references

Evaluation of the tabular feed energy and protein undegradability values of the national research council nutrient requirements of beef cattle. Professional Animal Scientist 21(5): 403-415, 2005

Application of the 1996 National Research Council Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle Model. Proceedings 2-105, 1996

Nutrient requirements of domestic animals. 3. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Publ. No. 1349). Nutrient requirements of domestic animals. 3. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, Washington, D.C., 38. Price: $1.50, 1966

Feed requirements of growing and fattening beef cattle: New Zealand experimental data compared with National Research Council (U.S.A.) and Agricultural Research Council (U.K.) feeding standards. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 18(3): 295-301, 1975

Feed requirements of growing and fattening beef cattle new zealand experimental data compared with national research council usa and agricultural research council united kingdom feeding standards. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 18(3): 295-302, 1975

Evaluation of the National Research Council (1996) dry matter intake prediction equations and relationships between intake and performance by feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 87(3): 1138-1146, 2008

National research council revises publications on nutrient requirements of swine and dairy cattle. Agri-Practice 10(1): 49, 1989

National academy of sciences national research council publication 1963 nutrient requirements of domestic animals no 5 nutrient requirements of sheep book. National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council Publication, 1968

Nutrient requirements of domestic animals. 1. Nutrient requirements of poultry. (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Publ. No. 1345). Nutrient requirements of domestic animals. 1. Nutrient requirements of poultry, Washington, D.C. (revised). v+ 28. Price: $1.50, 1966

Nutrient requirements of domestic animals. 9. Nutrient requirements of rabbits. (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Publ. No.1194). Nutrient requirements of domestic animals. 9. Nutrient requirements of rabbits, Washington, D.C., 17, 1966

Nutrient requirements for dairy cattle of the National Research Council versus some commonly used ration software. Journal of Dairy Science 81(11): 3049-3062, 1998

Evaluation of 1994 National Research Council nutrient requirements for male turkeys. Poultry Science 73(Suppl. 1): 121, 1994

Computer generation of breeding beef and feedlot cattle nutrient requirements. Computers in agriculture 1994: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, Orlando, Florida, USA, 6-9 February 1994: 145-147, 1994

Evaluation of National Research Council and Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein Systems for predicting requirements of Holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 81(2): 509-526, 1998

National Research Council (NRC): Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp. Aquaculture International 20(3): 601-602, 2012