+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Effects of maturity stage and feeding strategy of whole crop barley silage on intake, digestibility and milk production in dairy cows

Effects of maturity stage and feeding strategy of whole crop barley silage on intake, digestibility and milk production in dairy cows

Livestock Science 121(2-3): 155-161

Five diets containing concentrate, grass silage and whole crop barley silage (WCBS) harvested at different maturity stages were fed to 15 multiparous dairy cows in an incomplete change-over design over three periods. Three diets contained 10.7 kg dry matter (DM) concentrate, 4 kg DM grass silage, and ad libitum access to WCBS harvested at either the heading stage (B1), the early milk stage (B2) or the early dough stage (B3) of maturity. The other two diets contained 10.7 kg DM concentrate, whereas grass silage and WCBS at heading were mixed at two different ratios with a DM content of WCBS of either 0.30 (M1) or 0.70 (M2), and the mixtures were fed ad libitum. Intakes of DM (kg day(-1): B1 = 21.0, B2 = 20.6 and B3 = 20.0) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF; kg day(-1): B1 = 7.0, B2 = 6.4 and B3 = 63) decreased, whereas starch intake increased (kg day(-1): B1 = 3.1, B2 = 3.5 and B3 = 4.0) with increasing maturity at harvest. The apparent organic matter (CM) digestibility (g kg(-1): B1 = 800, B2 = 774 and B3 = 729) decreased with increasing maturity stage, and consequently so did the digestible OM intake. Milk (kg day(-1): B1 = 27.2, B2 = 26.1 and B3 = 25.9) and energy corrected milk (ECM; kg day(-1): B1 = 31.0, B2 = 29.4 and B3 = 28.2) yields, and protein concentration (g kg(-1): B1 = 37.1. B2 = 36.4 and B3 = 36.0) decreased with increasing maturity stage of the WCBS. When cows were fed diet B3 the milk fat concentration decreased (46.4 g kg(-1)) compared to diets B1 (49.3 g kg(-1)) and B2 (49.4 g kg(-1)). The difference in ECM yield between diets B1 and B3 was due to a combined effect of lower milk yield, and lower protein and fat concentrations. This was caused by the higher starch and lower NDF intakes with diet B3, which decreased the milk fat concentration. Moreover, a lower energy intake of diet B3 due to lower OM digestibility decreased milk protein concentration and milk yield. Mixing WCBS at the heading stage with grass silage (M2) decreased digestibility, compared to feeding the forages separately (B1). However, the differences were small and may be a result of soil contamination at harvest of some of the silages, which made the method with using incomplete faecal collection and internal marker acid insoluble ash less reliable. Including WCBS at the heading stage at 0.30 or 0.70 of forage DM did not affect DM intake or diet digestibility, probably because the grass silage in the study was very similar in energy content to the WCBS harvested at heading.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066218087

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.06.004

Related references

Whole-crop wheat for dairy cows: effects of crop maturity, a silage inoculant and an enzyme added before feeding on food intake and digestibility and milk production. Animal Science 74(2): 307-318, 2002

Effects of conservation method and stage of maturity on the feeding value of forages to dairy cows 4. effect of wilting on silage quality digestibility and milk production at restricted feeding of silage. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 20(3): 135-140, 1990

Effects of stage of maturity and conservation strategy on fermentation, feed intake and digestibility of whole-crop pea-oat silage used in dairy production. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A Animal Science 56(3-4): 137-147, 2006

Importance of NDF digestibility of whole crop maize silage for dry matter intake and milk production in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 219: 68-76, 2016

The effect of crop maturity on the nutritional value of maize silage for lactating dairy cows. 3. Food intake and milk production. Animal Science 71(2): 401-409, 2000

Whole-crop barley silage for dairy cows. II. Effect of harvesting stage on nutritional value and milk production. Kyushu Agricultural Research 41: 126-127, 1979

Effects of enhanced in vitro fiber digestibility of barley silage on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 84: 263-263, 2006

Corn silage maturity effects on intake and milk production by dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 75(Suppl. 1): 96, 1997

Mixing whole-crop pea-oat silage and grass-clover silage: positive effects on intake and milk production of dairy cows. Grass and forage science 62(4): 459-469, 2007

Effect of feeding silage from direct cut or wilted grass and hay upon food intake, digestibility, milk production and blood composition in dairy cows. Arch Tierernahr 17(1/2): 119-129, 1967

Feeding value of barley plants as related to stage of maturity: 2. In vivo digestibility and voluntary intake of silage. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A Animal Science 45(3): 153-158, 1995

The effect of the replacement of grass silage by increasing proportions of urea-treated whole-crop wheat on food intake and apparent digestibility and milk production by dairy cows. Animal Science 65(3): 343-351, 1997

Effects of the chop lengths of alfalfa silage and oat silage on feed intake, milk production, feeding behavior, and rumen fermentation of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91(5): 1942-1958, 2008

Effects of length of cut of whole crop corn silage on milk production in dairy cows. II. Effects on milk yield, milk composition and ruminal VFA during long-term feeding. Bulletin of the National Institute of Animal Industry, Japan (45): 7-12, 1986

Effects of physical form and stage of maturity at harvest of whole-crop barley silage on intake, chewing activity, diet selection and faecal particle size of dairy steers. Animal 4(1): 67-75, 2010