+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Soil microbial community response to controlled-release urea fertilizer under zero tillage and conventional tillage

Soil microbial community response to controlled-release urea fertilizer under zero tillage and conventional tillage

Applied Soil Ecology 45(3): 254-261

Soil microorganisms mediate many important biological processes for sustainable agriculture. The effect of a polymer-coated controlled-release urea (CRU, ESN (R)) on soil microbial communities was studied at six sites across western Canada from 2004 to 2006. Fertilizer treatments were CRU, urea and an unfertilized control. Timing of fertilizer application (fall vs. spring) was studied in 9 of the 18 site-years (combinations of sites and years). Wheat (Triticum aestivum L), canola (Brassica napus L) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L) were grown in rotation at five sites, and silage corn (Zea mays L) was grown in all 3 years at one site, under conventional tillage (CT) or zero tillage (ZT). The fertilizers were side-banded at 50-60 kg N ha(-1) for wheat, barley and canola, and broadcast at 150 kg N ha(-1) for corn. Microbial biomass C (MBC) and bacterial functional diversity and community-level physiological profiles (CLPPs) were determined at about the flowering stage of each crop. in situ CO(2) evolution (soil respiration) was measured, and microbial metabolic quotient (qCO(2)) determined, at one site in 2 years. In the rhizosphere, fertilizer effects on MBC and functional diversity were observed in 1 and 5 of 18 site-years, respectively; and in bulk soil in 4 site-years each. These effects were usually positive relative to the control. CRU increased MBC or functional diversity more than urea in 3 site-years, but the opposite was observed in 1 site-year. Time of fertilizer application affected MBC in 1, and functional diversity in 2, of 9 site-years in the rhizosphere, and no effects were observed in bulk soil. Fall-applied fertilizer increased MBC more than spring-applied fertilizer, but the opposite was observed for functional diversity. Tillage affected MBC and functional diversity in 4 and 5 of 18 site-years, respectively, in the rhizosphere, and in 3 and 4 site-years in bulk soil. Tillage effects were usually in favour of ZT. There were no treatment effects on CO(2) evolution, but an interactive effect of fertilizer and tillage on qCO(2) was observed in 1 year when qCO(2) in the control treatment was greater than that in either fertilizer treatment under CT, but urea increased qCO(2) relative to the control under ZT. Shifts in CLPPs were sometimes observed where the treatment effects described above were not significant. Notwithstanding the limitations of culture-dependent CLPPs, most fertilizer effects on soil microbiological properties were not statistically significant. Therefore, these fertilizers probably did not adversely affect most soil biological processes. Crown

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066234358

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.04.013

Related references

Effect of no-tillage and conventional tillage practices on the nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions in an upland soil: soil N2O emission as affected by the fertilizer applications. Applied Biological Chemistry 59(6): 787-797, 2016

Impact of No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage Systems on Soil Microbial Communities. Applied and Environmental Soil Science 2012: 1-10, 2012

Switching from conventional tillage to no-tillage: Soil N availability, N uptake, 15 N fertilizer recovery, and grain yield of durum wheat. Field Crops Research 218: 171-181, 2018

An economic study of controlled release urea and split applications of nitrogen as compared with non-coated urea under conventional and reduced tillage management. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 93(3): 523-534, 2013

Microbial biomass and activity at various soil depths in a Brazilian oxisol after two decades of no-tillage and conventional tillage. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42(12): 2174-2181, 2010

Contributions of root-derived carbon to soil microbial biomass in conventional tillage and no tillage plots. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 78(4 Suppl. ): 270, 1997

Short-term impact of an occasional tillage on microbial communities in a Vertosol after 43 years of no-tillage or conventional tillage. European Journal of Soil Biology 74: 32-38, 2016

Effects of conventional tillage and no tillage permutations on extracellular soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass under rice cultivation. Soil and Tillage Research 136: 51-60, 2014

Factors influencing soil accumulation of microbial cell wall products in no tillage versus conventional tillage agro-ecosystems. Ohio Journal of Science 101(1): A 25, 2001

Impact of no tillage vs. conventional tillage on the soil bacterial community structure in a winter wheat cropping succession in northern China. European Journal of Soil Biology 80: 35-42, 2017

Conventional tillage and minimum tillage in a wide crop rotation. Annual report 1977 of the soil tillage experiment IB 0011 on the Dr. H.J. Lovinkhoeve at Marknesse. Rapport, Instituut voor Bodemvruchtbaarheid (3-80): 51, 1980

Influence of urea fertilization and urease inhibitor on the size and activity of the soil microbial biomass under conventional and zero tillage at two sites. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 79(2): 255-263, 1999

Tillage practices on a tropical soil. II. Maize responses Conventional, plough, zero-tillage and manual or local tillage, on an alfisol having a 5% slope in the western part of Nigeria. International journal of biochemistry 14(2): 349-358, 1982

Effect of ridge tillage, no-tillage, and conventional tillage on soil temperature, water use, and crop performance in cold and semi-arid areas in Northeast China. Australian Journal of Soil Research 48(8): 737-744, 2010

Microbial community response to transition from conventional to conservation tillage in cotton fields. Applied Soil Ecology 40(3): 0-528, 2008