+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparing canopy temperature and leaf water potential as irrigation scheduling criteria of potato in water-saving irrigation strategies



Comparing canopy temperature and leaf water potential as irrigation scheduling criteria of potato in water-saving irrigation strategies



International Journal of Plant Production 11(2): 333-347



Irrigation scheduling is important in irrigation water management. In this study, full (FI), deficit (DI) and partial root drying (PRD) irrigation strategies were applied in Agria and Ramos potato cultivars. Canopy temperature (CT) and leaf water potential (LWP) were assessed as the potential tools for irrigation scheduling during the vegetative and productive growth stages. LWP varied between ca. -1.4 and -1.6 MPa and was not significantly different between FI, DI and PRD irrigation treatments. The LWP and CT values were not significant between the two potato cultivars during the measurements, but CT was frequently significant between the irrigation treatments such that the PRD treatments were significantly 5 and 2 degrees C warmer than FI and DI treatments, respectively. Higher CT in PRD caused significant yield penalty such that DI and FI produced almost two times higher fresh tuber yield. Analysis revealed that CT had significantly higher correlation (r=0.66) with water productivity (weight of fresh tuber yield divided by volume of applied irrigation water) than LWP, which its correlation was not significant (r=0.40). This showed that crop water productivity could be better controlled by CT. Moreover, it was realized that the seven-day irrigation interval was far longer than required and potatoes in all irrigation treatments were under water stress, especially in PRD, that might partially explain the 50% yield penalty of PRD compared to DI. The reason was that due to high atmospheric demand, soil water in the wet part of the root system would be completely depleted earlier by the time of next irrigation event. Conclusively, the CT is recommended as a more reliable crop water status and irrigation scheduling indicator than LWP in response to different water-saving irrigation managements.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 066335239

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Studies on the water saving irrigation of the field iv. on the effect of irrigation and investigated irrigation scheduling of water applied for the green soybeans. Bulletin of the College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine Nihon University (44): 105-111, 1987

Studies on the water saving irrigation of the field iii. the effect of irrigation and investigated irrigation scheduling of water applied. Bulletin of the College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine Nihon University (43): 128-134, 1986

Water-saving irrigation of the field. III. The effect of irrigation and investigated irrigation scheduling of water applied. Nihon Daigaku No Juigakubu gakujutsu kenkyu hokoku = Bulletin of the College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine Nihon University: (43) 128-134, 1986

Irrigation scheduling of table grapes under drip irrigation: an approach for saving irrigation water and energy costs in Chile. International Water and Irrigation 22(2): 44-50, 2002

Assessing basin irrigation and scheduling strategies for saving irrigation water and controlling salinity in the upper Yellow River Basin, China. Agricultural Water Management 93(3): 109-122, 2007

Evaluating leaf water potential, stomatal resistance and canopy surface temperature of tomatoes as indices for irrigation timing. Acta Horticulturae (100): 181-192, 1980

The effect of soil water potential method or irrigation and nitrogen on plant water relations canopy temperature yield and water use of radish. Journal of Horticultural Science 62(4): 507-512, 1987

Irrigation Scheduling Using Predawn Leaf Water Potential Improves Water Productivity in Drip-Irrigated Cotton. Crop Science 56(6): 3185-3195, 2016

Scheduling peach orchard irrigation in water stress conditions: use of relative transpiration and predawn leaf water potential. Fruits 68(2): 147-158, 2013

Water relations between leaf water potential, photosynthesis and agronomic vine response as a tool for establishing thresholds in irrigation scheduling. Scientia Horticulturae (Amsterdam) 114(3): 151-158, 2007

Potato canopy temperature for irrigation scheduling. Paper American Society of Agricultural Engineers: er 1989 (89-2033), 1989

Consumptive use of water and water quantity per irrigation after rainfall fundamental studies on irrigation scheduling for drip irrigation methods i. Transactions of the Japanese Society of Irrigation Drainage & Reclamation Engineering (142): 43-48, 1989

Comparing Sprinkler and Surface Irrigation for Wheat Using Multi-Criteria Analysis: Water Saving vs. Economic Returns. Water 9(1): 50, 2017

Leaf water potential for irrigation scheduling application to soybeans. 17th ICID European Regional Conference on Irrigation and Drainage, Varna, Bulgaria, 16-22 May, 1994 Volume 1: Yield response to water as affected by irrigation schedule: 203-210, 1994

Comparing a Smartphone Irrigation Scheduling Application with Water Balance and Soil Moisture-based Irrigation Methods: Part II-Plasticulture-grown Watermelon. Horttechnology 28(3): 362-369, 2018