+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Farmer innovation driven by needs and understanding: building the capacities of farmer groups for improved cooking stove construction and continued adaptation

Farmer innovation driven by needs and understanding: building the capacities of farmer groups for improved cooking stove construction and continued adaptation

Environmental Research Letters 12(12): 125001

Enhancing food security is one of the main goals of subsistence farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study investigates the implementation of improved loam-made cooking stoves and its contribution to coping and livelihood strategies. Controlled combustion, air as well as smoke flue, and heat insulation facilitate the more efficient fuel consumption of improved cooking stoves compared to traditional stoves-namely three stone fires. Although the majority of small-scale farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa rely on the free public good of firewood, the increasing time needed for collecting firewood implies high opportunity costs for productive members of the family. The primary outcomes for users of improved stoves are reduced fuel consumption, greater safety, saved time, and reduced smoke in the kitchen. The paper illustrates part of the output, outcome, and impact of a participatory action research approach for implementing improved cooking stoves. Special emphasis was put on enabling the villagers to construct their stoves without external support, hence having locally manufactured stoves made of mud, bricks, and dried grass. The impact pathway of improved cooking stoves followed the training-of-trainers concept, where members of the initially established farmer groups were trained to construct stoves on their own. Special focus was given to knowledge exchange and knowledge transfer in order to increase firewood efficiency and overall satisfaction of users of improved cook stoves. Encouraging the members to further adapt the stoves enabled them to scale-up the construction of improved cooked stoves into a business model and increase dissemination while creating income. Although many important benefits, like time and knowledge gain, were identified by the farmers after adoption of the new technology, we found adoption rates differed significantly between regions.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066347618

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa88d5

Related references

Building an understanding of water use innovation adoption processes through farmer-driven experimentation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 33(8-13): 859-872, 2008

Potential of pasture legumes in Low-External-Input and Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA). 2. Farmer adaptation of starter technology by farmer research groups in Luapula Province, Zambia. Experimental Agriculture 37(3): 309-317, 2001

Burkina Faso indigenous innovation in farmer-to-farmer extension. IK Notes (77): 3 pp., 2005

Contribution of Farmer-to-Farmer Video to Capital Assets Building: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 35(4): 408-435, 2011

Farmer first: farmer innovation and agricultural research. Farmer first: farmer innovation and agricultural research: xx + 218, 1989

Farmer-driven Innovation in New South Wales, Australia. Australian Geographer 44(1): 81-95, 2013

Strategy for the Development of Farmer Education with the Purpose of Construction of Farmer's Lifelong Learning System. Journal ofAgricultural Education and Human Resource Development 40(2): 1-31, 2008

Continued innovation in a Cambodian rice-based farming system: farmer testing and recombination of new elements. Agricultural Systems 69(1/2): 137-149, 2001

Understanding the Scope of Farmer Perceptions of Risk: Considering Farmer Opinions on the Use of Genetically Modified (GM) Crops as a Stakeholder Voice in Policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21(6): 541-558, 2008

Tobit analysis of farmer to farmer diffusion of improved pulse seeds in Bundelkhand region of India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84(10): 1254-1261, 2014

Factors influencing farmer-to-farmer transfer of an improved cowpea variety in Kano State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics 105(1): 1-13, 2004

Farmer-to-farmer technology diffusion and yield variation among adopters: the case of improved cowpea in northern Nigeria. Agricultural Economics 35(2): 203-211, 2006

Sharpening the typological approach of the farmer group to identify the performance of farmer participation in Intensified Farmer Cane (TRI). Majalah Perusahaan Gula 28(1/2): 30-42, 1992

Cowpea, farmer field schools and farmer-to-farmer extension: a Benin case study. Network Paper Agricultural Research and Extension Network (148): 15 pp., 2005

Farmer-to-farmer extension: opportunities for enhancing performance of volunteer farmer trainers in Kenya. Development in Practice 25(4): 503-517, 2015