+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Accuracy of the Single Cycle Length Method for Calculation of Aortic Effective Orifice Area in Irregular Heart Rhythms



Accuracy of the Single Cycle Length Method for Calculation of Aortic Effective Orifice Area in Irregular Heart Rhythms



Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 32(3): 344-350



In irregular heart rhythms, echocardiographic calculation of aortic effective orifice area (EOA) requires averaging measurements from multiple cardiac cycles. Whether a single cycle length method can be used to calculate aortic EOA in aortic stenosis with nonsinus rhythms is not known. Transthoracic echocardiograms of 100 patients with aortic stenosis and either atrial fibrillation (AF) or frequent ectopy (FE) were retrospectively reviewed. The aortic valve velocity time integral (VTIAV) and the left ventricular outflow tract VTI (VTILVOT) were measured by two methods: the standard method (averaging multiple beats) and the single cycle length method. The latter matches the R-R intervals for VTIAV and VTILVOT. Stroke volume, EOA, and Doppler velocity index were calculated by both methods in all patients. The single cycle length method was used for short and long R-R cycles in AF and for postectopic beats (long R-R cycles) in FE. In AF, long R-R cycles resulted in larger stroke volumes (73 ± 21 vs 63 ± 18 mL; P ≤ .0001) but no difference in EOA (0.84 ± 0.27 vs 0.82 ± 0.27 cm2; P = .11), whereas short R-R cycles resulted in smaller stroke volumes (55 ± 18 vs 63 ± 18 mL, P ≤ .0001) but a larger EOA (0.86 ± 0.28 vs 0.82 ± 0.27 cm2; P = .01). In FE, the postectopic beat led to larger stroke volumes (96.1 ± 28 vs 78 ± 23 mL; P < .0001) and a larger EOA (0.99 ± 0.32 vs 0.94 ± 0.32 cm2; P = .0006) and Doppler velocity index (0.24 ± 0.07 vs 0.23 ± 0.07; P < .001). In AF patients, the single, long cycle length method of calculating EOA can be used instead of averaging multiple cardiac cycles. The single cycle length method used on a postextrasystolic beat results in a larger EOA than a normal sinus beat and may have utility in clinical decision-making.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066446891

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30704832

DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.11.018


Related references

Comparative accuracy of proximal flow convergence method for calculation of orifice area of prosthetic mitral valve. European Heart Journal 17(ABSTR Suppl. ): 251, 1996

What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlin area?. Journal of Heart Valve Disease 15(5): 601-608, 2006

Color Doppler proximal isovelocity surface area method for calculation of effective orifice area in prosthetic mitral valves In vito and clinical transesophageal echo studies. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 21(2 Suppl. A): 390A, 1993

Effective aortic regurgitant orifice area description of a method based on the conservation of mass. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 18(3): 761-768, 1991

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 14: 23, 2012

A method for estimating aortic regurgitant effective orifice area by digital Doppler color flow mapping. Journal of Heart Valve Disease 7(1): 102-107, 1998

Application of the proximal flow convergence method to calculate the effective regurgitant orifice area in aortic regurgitation. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology. 32(4): 1032-1039,., 1998

Aortic effective regurgitant orifice area computed using a new digital Doppler color flow mapping method. Circulation 96(8 Suppl. ): I699, 10/21/97, 1997

Application of proximal flow convergence method to calculate effective regurgitant orifice area in aortic regurgitation. Circulation 96(8 Suppl. ): I699, 10/21/97, 1997

Comparison of direct planimetry of mitral valve regurgitation orifice area by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography to effective regurgitant orifice area obtained by proximal flow convergence method and vena contracta area determined by color Doppler echocardiography. American Journal of Cardiology 107(3): 452-458, 2011

Quantification of mitral regurgitation orifice area by 3-dimensional echocardiography: Comparison with effective regurgitant orifice area by PISA method and proximal regurgitant jet diameter. International Journal of Cardiology 86(1): 87-98, 2002

Quantification of mitral regurgitation orifice area by three-dimensional echocardiography Comparison with effective regurgitant orifice area by PISA method and proximal regurgitant jet diameter. European Heart Journal 22(Abstract Suppl.): 135, 2001

Improving the accuracy of effective orifice area assessment after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: validation of left ventricular outflow tract diameter and pulsed-wave Doppler location and impact of three-dimensional measurements. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 28(11): 1283-1293, 2015

A geometry independent 3D digital color Doppler method which allows accurate calculation of instantaneous flow rate can be used to accurately define dynamically changing effective orifice area An in vitro study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 35(2 Suppl A): 441A, 2000

Effective regurgitant orifice area by the color Doppler flow convergence method for evaluating the severity of chronic aortic regurgitation. An animal study. Circulation 93(3): 594-602, 1996