+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Polarity Specific Effects of Cross-Hemispheric tDCS Coupled With Approach-Avoidance Training on Chocolate Craving



Polarity Specific Effects of Cross-Hemispheric tDCS Coupled With Approach-Avoidance Training on Chocolate Craving



Frontiers in Pharmacology 9: 1500



Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) has already been shown to decrease craving for food. However, it remains unclear whether a single session of tDCS combined with a cognitive bias modification (CBM) task may affect explicit and implicit measures of craving for chocolate. Fifty-one healthy volunteers (38 females; mean age: 22.12 ± 3.38) were randomly allocated to CBM training based on the Approach Avoidance task and either Sham, Right anodal-Left cathodal (RALC), or Left anodal-Right cathodal (LARC) tDCS. Results show that there was an increase in the explicit craving for chocolate, as assessed by the Visual Analog Scale [F(2, 46) = 3.239, p = 0.048], from the baseline to post-intervention. Participants which received LARC tDCS were explicitly self-reporting more craving for chocolate than those that received RALC tDCS (p = 0.023). Moreover, this effect was also observed on the implicit measure [F(2, 46) = 4.168, p = 0.022]. LARC tDCS significantly increased the implicit preference for chocolate when comparing to both RALC (p = 0.009) and Sham tDCS (p = 0.034). Previous studies have shown that RALC tDCS over the PFC is able to effectively decrease craving for food. Interestingly, the present data not only does not reproduce such result, but instead it suggests that LARC tDCS can actually increase the preference for chocolate. This result is compatible with recent models of brain laterality, in which cue craving seems to be more dependent on the left hemisphere. Thus, shifting the activity to the left hemisphere (while simultaneously reducing the activity over the homotopic region) may have led to this increased implicit as well as explicit preference for chocolate.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066471325

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30733678

DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01500


Related references

The pulling power of chocolate: Effects of approach-avoidance training on approach bias and consumption. Appetite 99: 46-51, 2016

The contextual malleability of approach-avoidance training effects: approaching or avoiding fear conditioned stimuli modulates effects of approach-avoidance training. Cognition and Emotion 32(2): 341-349, 2018

Chocolate equals stop. Chocolate-specific inhibition training reduces chocolate intake and go associations with chocolate. Appetite 87: 318-323, 2015

Return of experimentally induced chocolate craving after extinction in a different context: divergence between craving for and expecting to eat chocolate. Behaviour Research and Therapy 46(3): 375-391, 2008

Modulation of selective attention by polarity-specific tDCS effects. Neuropsychologia 68: 1-7, 2015

The effects of cross-hemispheric dorsolateral prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on task switching. Brain Stimulation 6(4): 660-667, 2013

Effects of repeated anodal tDCS coupled with cognitive training for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 29(3): E20-E29, 2015

Does culture create craving? Evidence from the case of menstrual chocolate craving. Plos one 12(7): E0181445, 2017

The craving stops before you feel it: neural correlates of chocolate craving during cue exposure with response prevention. Cerebral Cortex 24(6): 1589-1600, 2014

Cravings, currents and cadavers: What is the magnitude of tDCS effects on food craving outcomes?. Nutritional Neuroscience 2018: 1-4, 2018

Spatiotemporal dynamics of the hedonic processing of chocolate images in individuals with and without trait chocolate craving. Appetite 58(3): 790-799, 2012

A multidimensional ambivalence model of chocolate craving: construct validity and associations with chocolate consumption and disordered eating. Eating Behaviors 9(1): 1-12, 2008

Effects of olfactory sense on chocolate craving. Appetite 105: 700-704, 2016

Effects of chocolate milk consumption on markers of muscle recovery following soccer training: a randomized cross-over study. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 7: 19, 2010

Facilitative effects of bi-hemispheric tDCS in cognitive deficits of Parkinson disease patients. Medical Hypotheses 82(2): 138-140, 2014