+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Real-world clinical evidence on rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban compared with -vitamin K antagonists in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic literature review



Real-world clinical evidence on rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban compared with -vitamin K antagonists in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic literature review



Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 19(3): 243-244




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066588400

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30870051

DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1592834


Related references

Real-world clinical evidence on rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban compared with vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic literature review. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 19(1): 27-36, 2019

Real-world comparison of bleeding risks among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients prescribed apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban. Plos one 13(11): E0205989, 2018

Major bleeding risk among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients initiated on apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or warfarin: a "real-world" observational study in the United States. International Journal of Clinical Practice 70(9): 752-763, 2016

Real-world comparison of major bleeding risk among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients initiated on apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. A propensity score matched analysis. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 116(5): 975-986, 2016

Cost-effectiveness analysis of dabigatran versus rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation using real-world evidence in elderly US Medicare beneficiaries. Current Medical Research and Opinion 34(1): 55-63, 2018

Real-world 2-year outcome of atrial fibrillation treatment with dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban in patients with and without chronic kidney disease. Internal and Emergency Medicine 14(8): 1259-1270, 2019

Discontinuation risk comparison among 'real-world' newly anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients: Apixaban, warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban. Plos one 13(4): E0195950, 2018

Representativeness of the dabigatran, apixaban and rivaroxaban clinical trial populations to real-world atrial fibrillation patients in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional analysis using the General Practice Research Database. Bmj Open 2(6):, 2012

Bleeding risk of apixaban, dabigatran, and low-dose rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a propensity matched analysis of administrative claims data. Current Medical Research and Opinion 33(11): 1955-1963, 2017

Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States Medicare population. Current Medical Research and Opinion 33(9): 1595-1604, 2017

Comparison of clinical characteristics of real-life atrial fibrillation patients treated with vitamin K antagonists, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban: results from the CRAFT study. Kardiologia Polska 76(5): 889-898, 2018

Comparative effectiveness and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. International Journal of Cardiology 268: 113-119, 2018

Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, or Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Subgroups. Thrombosis 2013: 640723, 2013

Net clinical benefit of new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) versus no treatment in a 'real world' atrial fibrillation population: a modelling analysis based on a nationwide cohort study. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 107(3): 584-589, 2012

Comparison of cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation with dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation across countries. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 37(4): 507-523, 2014