+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Differential alveolar bone modeling after orthodontic retraction

Differential alveolar bone modeling after orthodontic retraction

Journal of the American Dental Association 150(4): 313-320

Distinct, irregular, and hard nodular protuberances similar to the morphologic features of exostoses can occasionally be noted on the labial surface of the alveolar bone after orthodontic retraction of anterior teeth in adults. These have long been believed to be exostoses developed in response to loading. However, specific characterization of this phenomenon has not been documented. Three cases of patients displaying multiple irregular labial bony protuberances after retraction of anterior teeth are reported. These protuberances appeared during retraction and became more prominent with additional retraction. Serial clinical photographs, lateral cephalograms, digital models, and cone-beam computed tomography scans were evaluated. On the basis of 3-dimensional superimpositions of digital models and cone-beam computed tomographic scans, the irregular protuberances appear to be the result of differential alveolar bone modeling, with more resorption of bone covering the tooth root than that of interdental bone, and not of true bone overgrowth or deposition (that is, exostoses). Orthodontic patients often seek treatment to improve occlusion as well as esthetics. Although this study shows that these protuberances are the result of differential modeling, they may still be perceived by patients as "outgrowths," which may cause concerns related to esthetics or comfort. Clinicians should note that these protuberances are a possible outcome when large amounts of bodily retraction and root movement of anterior teeth are planned. Patients who experience psychosocial problems with this phenomenon may be candidates for alveoloplasty.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066635070

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 30922461

DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.12.029

Related references

Dento-Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis for rapid Orthodontic Canine Retraction. Journal of International Oral Health 5(6): 31-41, 2014

Alveolar bone morphology of maxillary central incisors near grafted alveolar clefts after orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 152(4): 501-508.E1, 2017

Impact of selective alveolar decortication on bisphosphonate burdened alveolar bone during orthodontic tooth movement. Archives of Oral Biology 60(11): 1681-1689, 2016

What happened to the alveolar bone during retraction?. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 140(3): 284; Author Reply 284-5, 2011

Expression of bone markers and micro-CT analysis of alveolar bone during orthodontic relapse. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research 17(4): 249-258, 2016

Bone regeneration in alveolar bone dehiscences related to orthodontic tooth movements. European Journal of Orthodontics 5(2): 105-114, 1983

Serum and alveolar bone phosphatase changes reflect bone turnover during orthodontic tooth movement. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 103(4): 320-326, 1993

Analysis of bone resorption after secondary alveolar cleft bone grafts before and after canine eruption in connection with orthodontic gap closure or prosthodontic treatment. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 61(11): 1245-1248, 2003

Factors related to alveolar bone thickness during upper incisor retraction. Angle Orthodontist 83(3): 394-401, 2013

Hounsfield unit change in root and alveolar bone during canine retraction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 147(4): 445-453, 2015

Atypical orthodontic extraction pattern managed by differential en-masse retraction against a temporary skeletal anchorage device in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 140(3): 423-432, 2011

Visualization of orthodontic forces during cuspid retraction retraction. Journal of Dental Research 52(SPEC ISSUE): 78, 1973

Comparison of maxillary canine retraction with sliding mechanics and a retraction spring: a three-dimensional analysis based on a midpalatal orthodontic implant. European Journal of Orthodontics 26(6): 585-589, 2005

An investigation into the relationship of alveolar bone height and timing of canine retraction following premolar extraction. Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa 38(5): 285-289, 1983

Observations on the response of alveolar bone to orthodontic force. American Journal of Orthodontics 58(3): 284-294, 1970