+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Immediate Placement of Trabecular Implants in Sites of Failed Implants



Immediate Placement of Trabecular Implants in Sites of Failed Implants



International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 34(5): E77–e83



Immediate replacement of a new implant for a failed implant has the benefit of reducing treatment time and increasing patient satisfaction. Limited studies have reported the outcome of implants placed in previously failed sites. It has been proposed that porous tantalum trabecular implants (TM implants) may offer superior integration due to their structure and may be beneficial in situations that normally present a clinical challenge. The purpose of this pilot study was to analyze dental implant survival in a series where failed implants were immediately replaced by TM implants. This pilot study assessed 16 implants in 14 patients where failed implants were immediately replaced by TM implants. All clinical procedures were performed by the same board-certified periodontist in a private practice setting. The implants were restored 8 to 10 weeks postoperatively with stock contour abutments and cemented crowns. Patients were recalled yearly for radiographs and clinical assessment of probing depth, bleeding on probing, and integration status. Data were collected on patient demographics, smoking status, periodontal health status, implant site and size, and the use of membranes and/or grafts. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the demographics of the study population, and to calculate overall implant survival proportions. The mean age at time of first implant placement was 54.4 years, with a range of 41 to 74 years. Distribution by sex was evenly split at 50% males and 50% females. The majority of patients were smokers (68.8%), and 75% of the patients had a history of moderate or severe periodontal disease. For the replacement TM implants, most were a larger size than the original implant, 6 × 10 versus 4.8 × 10. Sixteen implants were immediately placed into failed implant sites, and 15 (93.8%) had a successful outcome and continue to maintain function at 5 years post-implantation. Radiographs of the TM implant site showed excellent bone-to-implant contact, and the patients did not show clinical signs or symptoms of pain, mobility, infection, or tenderness. Although the limited sample size limits comparisons to larger studies, this initial finding suggests that TM implants may be suitable for immediate placement into failed implant sites.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 066801126

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 31107931

DOI: 10.11607/jomi.7379


Related references

The failure rate of single tooth implants replacing failed implants may be greater than the failure rate of implants placed in sites previously not treated with implants. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice 9(1): 32-33, 2009

Success and survival of single dental implants placed in sites of previously failed implants. Journal of Periodontology 78(9): 1670-1674, 2007

Implants placed in sites of previously failed implants: a systematic review. Implant Dentistry 23(3): 311-318, 2014

Survival of dental implants placed in sites of previously failed implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 28(11): 1348-1353, 2017

Placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: 4 to 7 years retrospective evaluation of 95 immediate implants. Journal of Periodontology 68(11): 1110-1116, 1997

Survival of Dental Implants Replacing Previously Failed Implants: A Retrospective Study in a University Setting. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 33(6): 1312-1319, 2018

Direct replacement of failed CP titanium implants with larger-diameter, HA-coated Ti-6Al-4V implants: report of five cases. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 10(6): 736-743, 1995

Modes of failure of Osteonics constrained tripolar implants: a retrospective analysis of forty-three failed implants. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 90(7): 1553-1560, 2008

Prognosis of the implants replaced after removal of failed dental implants. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 110(3): 281-286, 2010

Poor outcomes of fusion with Trabecular Metal implants after failed total ankle replacement: Early results in 11 patients. Orthopaedics and Traumatology Surgery and Research 104(2): 231-237, 2018

A Retrospective Analysis of Dental Implants Replacing Failed Implants in Grafted Maxillary Sinus: A Case Series. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 30(5): 1156-1160, 2015

Osseointegrated implants used to replace failed endosseous implants. Implant Society 2(3): 8-11, 1991

Osseointegration of rough acid-etched implants: one-year follow-up of placement of 100 minimatic implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 12(1): 65-73, 1997

Long-term results after placement of dental implants: longitudinal study of 1,964 implants over 16 years. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 14(5): 748-755, 1999

Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 8(2): 151-161, 1993