+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Exploring the winners and losers of marine environmental governance/Marine spatial planning: Cui bono ?/More than fishy business: epistemology, integration and conflict in marine spatial planning/Marine spatial planning: power and scaping/Surely not all planning is evil?/Marine spatial planning: a Canadian perspective/Maritime spatial planning ad utilitatem omnium /Marine spatial planning: it is better to be on the train than being hit by it/Reflections from the perspective of recreational angle



Exploring the winners and losers of marine environmental governance/Marine spatial planning: Cui bono ?/More than fishy business: epistemology, integration and conflict in marine spatial planning/Marine spatial planning: power and scaping/Surely not all planning is evil?/Marine spatial planning: a Canadian perspective/Maritime spatial planning ad utilitatem omnium /Marine spatial planning: it is better to be on the train than being hit by it/Reflections from the perspective of recreational angle



Planning Theory & Practice 17(1): 121-151




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 067347458

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2015.1131482


Related references

Maritime Spatial Planning || Governance baselines as a basis for adaptive marine spatial planning. Journal of Coastal Conservation 15(2): 313-322, 2011

Maritime Spatial Planning || The integration of land and marine spatial planning. Journal of Coastal Conservation 15(2): 291-303, 2011

Maritime Spatial Planning || Zoning, a fundamental cornerstone of effective Marine Spatial Planning: lessons learnt from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Journal of Coastal Conservation 15(2): 271-278, 2011

Maritime Spatial Planning || Advancing objectives-based, integrated ocean management through marine spatial planning: current and future directions on the Scotian Shelf off Nova Scotia, Canada. Journal of Coastal Conservation 15(2): 247-255, 2011

Geopolitical factors of maritime policies and marine spatial planning State, regions, and geographical planning scope. Marine Policy 33(4): 624-634, 2009

Using Systematic Conservation Planning to support Marine Spatial Planning and achieve marine protection targets in the transboundary Benguela Ecosystem. Ocean & Coastal Management 168: 117-129, 2019

The Spanish approach to marine spatial planning. Marine Strategy Framework Directive vs. EU Integrated Maritime Policy. Marine Policy 36(1): 18-27, 2012

Marine spatial planning and terrestrial spatial planning: reflecting on new agendas. Environment and Planning C 33(5): 1156-1172, 2015

EU marine strategy framework directive (MSFD) and marine spatial planning (MSP): Which is the more dominant and practicable contributor to maritime policy in the UK?. Marine Policy 43: 359-366, 2014

Achieving integration in marine governance through marine spatial planning: Findings from practice in the United States. Ocean & Coastal Management 167: 197-207, 2019

Towards sustainability of marine governance: Challenges and enablers for stakeholder integration in transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea. Ocean & Coastal Management 177: 200-212, 2019

A Marine Spatial Planning framework for the optimal siting of Marine Renewable Energy Installations: two Danish case studies. Journal of Coastal Research 165: 1623-1628, 2013

Mapping fisheries for marine spatial planning: Gear-specific vessel monitoring system (VMS), marine conservation and offshore renewable energy. Marine Policy 45: 293-300, 2014

A comparison of marine spatial planning approaches in China: Marine functional zoning and the marine ecological red line. Marine Policy 62: 94-101, 2015

Coexistence dilemmas in European marine spatial planning practices. The case of marine renewables and marine protected areas. Energy Policy 97: 391-399, 2016