+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour



Randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour



Health Renaissance 9(2): 88-90




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 068461164

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.3126/hren.v9i2.4979


Related references

A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. American Journal of Perinatology 26(1): 33-38, 2008

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Vaginal Misoprostol versus Cervical Foley Plus Oral Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction. Yearbook of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health 2009: 83-84, 2009

Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia E Obstetricia 32(7): 346-351, 2011

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial. Bmc Pregnancy and Childbirth 18(1): 300, 2018

Combination of foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 122(1): 156, 2013

Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 25(6): 565-568, 2005

Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 56(6): 578-584, 2016

Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 57(1): 119, 2018

Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial. Bmc Pregnancy and Childbirth 19(1): 14-14, 2019

Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 186(6): 1124-1129, 2002

A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley for labor induction. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 187(6 Supplement): S57, 2002

A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 89(8): 1045-1052, 2010

A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women. American Journal of Perinatology 21(3): 139-146, 2004

A Randomized Trial Comparing Vaginal Misoprostol versus Foley Catheter With Concurrent Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 59(12): 811-813, 2004

Three doses of oral misoprostol versus an intra-cervical Foley catheter for 24 hours for pre-induction cervical ripening in post- dated pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. Ceylon Medical Journal 62(2): 77-82, 2017