The elderly patient with urge incontinence or urge-stress incontinence - efficacy and cardiac safety of propiverine

Dorschner, W.; Stolzenburg, J.-U.; Griebenow, R.; Halaska, M.; Brünjes, R.; Frank, M.; Wieners, F.

Aktuelle Urologie 34(2): 102-108

2003


ISSN/ISBN: 0001-7868
PMID: 14566693
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-38906
Accession: 068798883

Download citation:  
Text
  |  
BibTeX
  |  
RIS

Article/Abstract emailed within 0-6 h
Payments are secure & encrypted
Powered by Stripe
Powered by PayPal

Abstract
The efficacy of propiverine in elderly patients suffering from urge incontinence or urge-stress incontinence was intended to be investigated. Especially in elderly patients a cardiac influence of propiverine is possible due to its dual mode of action. That is why besides the efficacy especially the cardiac safety was intended to be investigated. Ninety-eight patients (21 male, 77 female; 67.7 +/- 6.3 years of age) suffering from urgency, urge incontinence or mixed urge-stress incontinence were included in the double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomized study. After a two-week placebo run-in period, the patients received propiverine (15 mg t. i. d.) or placebo (t. i. d.) for four weeks. Before (U 1, U 2) and during the treatment period (U 3, U 4), standard ECG's and 24 h long-term ECG's were recorded. Propiverine caused a significant reduction in the micturition frequency (U 2 : 8.7 +/- 4.2, U 4 : 6.5 +/- 3.2 ml; p < 0.01) reflected in a significant increase in the average micturition volume (U 2 : 163.5 +/- 65.9, U 4 : 216.3 +/- 101.5 ml; p < 0.01) and a significant reduction in the episodes of incontinence (- 54 %; p < or = 0.05). These findings were confirmed by the overall assessment after four weeks in which approximately 90 % of patients under propiverine were either free from urge incontinence and urge symptoms or improved. The efficacy parameters demonstrated a better efficacy for urge incontinence than for mixed urge-stress incontinence. Resting and ambulatory electrocardiograms evidenced no significant changes. Neither QTc interval nor other cardiac parameters were relevantly altered. The frequency of cardiac events (Lown classes IV a/b) was fortuitous, revealing no difference between placebo and propiverine. The incidence of adverse events was very low (2 % dryness of the mouth under propiverine) and confirmed by the findings from the quality of life questionnaires. A favourable benefit-risk ratio in the treatment of elderly patients suffering from urgency, urge incontinence or combined urge-stress incontinence is therefore proven for propiverine. Cardiac arrhythmia were not induced.