Labor induction place at 39 weeks in low-risk nulliparous women
Hamadmad, R.; Delorme, P.; Michel, A.S.
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite and Senologie 48(4): 404-405
2020
ISSN/ISBN: 2468-7189
PMID: 32050101
DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.02.005
Accession: 069808621
PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90
Related References
Peleg, D.; Warsof, S.L. 2020: The impact of induction of labor at 39 weeks on the incidence of stillbirth in low-risk women American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 223(1): 139-140Po', G.; Oliver, E.A.; Reddy, U.M.; Silver, R.M.; Berghella, V. 2020: The impact of induction of labor at 39 weeks in low-risk women on the incidence of stillbirth American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 222(1): 88-90
Wagner, S.M.; Sandoval, G.; Grobman, W.A.; Bailit, J.L.; Wapner, R.J.; Varner, M.W.; Thorp, J.M.; Prasad, M.; Tita, A.T.N.; Saade, G.R.; Sorokin, Y.; Rouse, D.J.; Tolosa, J.E. 2022: Labor Induction at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management in Low-Risk Parous Women American Journal of Perinatology 39(5): 519-525
Sinkey, R.G.; Lacevic, J.; Reljic, T.; Hozo, I.; Gibson, K.S.; Odibo, A.O.; Djulbegovic, B.; Lockwood, C.J. 2018: Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: the impact on maternal and neonatal risk PLOS one 13(4): E0193169
Hersh, A.R.; Skeith, A.E.; Sargent, J.A.; Caughey, A.B. 2019: Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation Versus Expectant Management for Low-Risk Nulliparous Women Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 74(11): 633-635
Sinkey, R.G.; Blanchard, C.T.; Szychowski, J.M.; Ausbeck, E.; Subramaniam, A.; Tita, A.T. 2019: Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk multiparous women American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 220(1): S21-S22
Sinkey, R.G.; Lacevic, J.; Reljic, T.; Hozo, I.; Gibson, K.S.; Odibo, A.O.; Djulbegovic, B.; Lockwood, C.J. 2018: Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk Plos one 13(4): E0193169
Son, G.H.; Kim, J.H.; Kwon, J.Y.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, Y.W. 2013: Risk factors for cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 76(4): 254-259
Hersh, A.R.; Skeith, A.E.; Sargent, J.A.; Caughey, A.B. 2019: Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 220(6): 590.E1-590.E10
Gelisen, O.; Caliskan, E.; Dilbaz, S.; Ozdas, E.; Dilbaz, B.; Ozdas, E.; Haberal, A. 2005: Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 120(2): 164-169
El-Sayed, Y.Y.; Rice, M.M.; Grobman, W.A.; Reddy, U.M.; Tita, A.T.N.; Silver, R.M.; Mallett, G.; Hill, K.; Thom, E.A.; Wapner, R.J.; Rouse, D.J.; Saade, G.R.; Thorp, J.M.; Chauhan, S.P.; Chien, E.K.; Casey, B.M.; Gibbs, R.S.; Srinivas, S.K.; Swamy, G.K.; Simhan, H.N.; Macones, G.A. 2020: Elective Labor Induction at 39 Weeks of Gestation Compared with Expectant Management: Factors Associated with Adverse Outcomes in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women Obstetrics and Gynecology 136(4): 692-697
Wing, D.; Guberman, C.; Fassett, M. 2003: A comparison of oral mifepristone to intravenous oxytocin for pre-induction cervical ripening and labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes beyond 36 weeks gestation American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 189(6 Suppl): S204
Sichitiu, J.; Desseauve, D. 2019: Should we offer elective induction of labor to nulliparous women at 39 weeks? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 221(3): 288
Pascuzzi, L.Ann. 2018: An Account of Labor and Birth Following a High-Risk Pregnancy That Ended in Induction of Labor at 37 Weeks: An Acknowledgment of When Option B Can Still Lead to a Positive Birth Experience Journal of Perinatal Education 27(2): 66-68
Kaimal, A.J.; Little, S.E.; Odibo, A.O.; Stamilio, D.M.; Grobman, W.A.; Long, E.F.; Owens, D.K.; Caughey, A.B. 2011: Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 204(2): 137.E1-9
Kaimal, A.J.; Little, S.E.; Odibo, A.O.; Stamilio, D.M.; Grobman, W.A.; Long, E.F.; Owens, D.K.; Caughey, A.B. 2011: Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 204(2): 137-138
Miller, N R.; Cypher, R L.; Foglia, L M.; Pates, J A.; Nielsen, P E. 2016: Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation Obstetric and Gynecologic Survey 71(4): 197-198
Palatnik, A.; Kominiarek, M.A. 2020: Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks American Journal of Perinatology 37(7): 695-707
Melamed, N.; Ray, J.G.; Geary, M.; Bedard, D.; Yang, C.; Sprague, A.; Murray-Davis, B.; Barrett, J.; Berger, H. 2016: Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 214(3): 364.E1-8
Melamed, N.; Ray, J.G.; Barrett, J.; Geary, M.; Bedard, D.; Sprague, A.; Yang, C.; Berger, H. 2016: Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean section in women with gestational diabetes mellitus American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 214(1): S50-S51