Experimental and theoretical evaluation of typing methods based upon random amplification of genomic restriction fragments (AFLP) for bacterial population genetics

Mougel, C.; Teyssier, S.; D'Angelo, C.; Groud, K.; Neyra, M.; Sidi-Boumedine, K.; Cloeckaert, A.; Peloille, M.; Baucheron, S.; Chaslus-Dancla, E.; Jarraud, S.; Meugnier, H.; Forey, F.; Vandenesch, F.; Lina, G.; Etienne, J.; Thioulouse, J.; Manceau, C.; Robbe, P.; Nalin, R.; Briolay, J.; Nesme, X.

Genetics Selection Evolution 33: S319-S338

2001


ISSN/ISBN: 0999-193X
DOI: 10.1186/bf03500887
Accession: 070550130

Download citation:  
Text
  |  
BibTeX
  |  
RIS

Article/Abstract emailed within 0-6 h
Payments are secure & encrypted
Powered by Stripe
Powered by PayPal

Abstract
The reliability and the level of taxonomic resolution of the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) method were evaluated with species of pathogenic bacteria involved in human, animal and plant diseases. The method was found to be very versatile as it can be adapted to the individual genome constraints of all tested species. The calculation of a genetic distance d corresponding to the average dissimilarity between actual overall genome sequences was proposed for comparing AFLP data. Bacterial models showed clearly different patterns between strains belonging to different genomic species, while patterns were clearly similar within a given species. The threshold which distinguishes between inter and infra-specific distances indicates a critical overall genome diversity of about 14% (d = 0.14). AFLP had more resolution power than serology, phage typing, PFGE and restriction analysis of ribosomal intergenic spacers. In the latter case, regression analysis showed that PCR-RFLP of ribosomal intergenic spacers can only be used to differentiate bacteria which have at least 3.4% (d = 0.034) nucleotide differences between their respective genomes. Finally, an improved procedure using newly developed software was also proposed in order to standardize the capture of reliable data and their numeric treatment for the future development of AFLP data bases.