EurekaMag
+ Translate
+ Most Popular
Gaucher's disease;thirty-two years experience at Siriraj Hospital
A study of Macrobathra Meyrick from China (Lepidoptera, Cosmopterigidae)
First occurrence in ores of tetragonal chalcocite
Effects of trace element nutrition on sleep patterns in adult women
N.Z. range management guidelines. 2. Design of grazing management systems for tussock country
A case of lipoma of the esophagus
A revision of world Acanthosomatidae (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): keys to and descriptions of subfamilies, tribes and genera, with designation of types
Life history of the coronate scyphozoan Linuche unguiculata (Swartz, 1788)
Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds
Mutagenicity studies on two chromium(III) coordination compounds
The formation of the skeleton. I. Growth of a long bone. 1st appearance of a center of calcification
Leucopenia and abnormal liver function in travellers on malaria chemoprophylaxis
The joint commission: four key root causes loom large in sentinel event data
Treatment of vitiligo with topical 15% lactic acid solution in combination with ultra violet-A
Behaviour of dairy cows within three hours after feed supply: I. Influence of housing type and time elapsing after feed supply
Observations of the propagation velocity and formation mechanism of burst fractures caused by gunshot
Management and control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Lebanon: results from the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS)
The diet composition and nutritional knowledge of patients with anorexia nervosa
Physoporella croatica Herak, 1958 of the Slovak karst Anisian (Slovakia, the West Carpathians Mts.)
Bright lights, big noise. How effective are vehicle warning systems?
Ein Plesiosaurier-Rest mit Magensteinen aus mittlerem Lias von Quedlinburg
Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis in patients with sterility
Monster soup: the microscope and Victorian fantasy
Preliminary tests with residual sprays against poultry lice
Duration of the life of plants in phylogeny

Characterizing the Frequency Distributions for Fruit Firmness of Sweet Cherry Cultivars


Characterizing the Frequency Distributions for Fruit Firmness of Sweet Cherry Cultivars



HortScience 51(6): 775



ISSN/ISBN: 0018-5345

Fruit firmness is among the most important characteristics for the quality of sweet cherries. However, little has been published on its underlying frequency distribution. This research was undertaken to examine the firmness distributions (n = 48) from six cultivars [Sandra Rose, Summit, Lapins, Skeena, Sumtare (Sweetheart (TM)), and 13S2009 (Staccato (TM))], two field treatments [with or without gibberellic acid (GA)], two storage times (0 and 7 days), and two growing seasons (2013 and 2014). Fruit was sampled (n = 300) at optimal maturity and firmness was evaluated using the FirmTech2 Fruit Firmness Tester. Firmness distributions were examined using descriptive statistics: mean, median, standard deviation (SD), minimum, maximum, range, skewness, and excess kurtosis. Nonnormality was assessed using skewness and kurtosis test statistics. Exponential models were fitted to the ascending and descending portions of the distributions and the proportion of "too soft" (percentage <2.56N.mm(-1)) and "too hard" (percentage >4.71 N.mm(-1)) fruit was determined. A relatively high proportion of distributions were nonnormal (16/24 to 18/24), either skewed, peaked, or both. While most skewed distributions were skewed negatively, with a higher proportion of softer fruit, the distributions for 'Sandra Rose' were skewed positively, with a higher proportion of firmer fruit. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed seasonal, cultivar, treatment, and storage effects among three subsets of cultivars with differing characteristic firmness. The softer early-harvest cultivars (Sandra Rose and Summit) had a higher proportion of "too soft" fruit. GA and storage treatments increased mean firmness and reduced the proportion of "too soft" fruit. The firmer late-harvest cultivars (Skeena, Sumtare, and 13S2009) had a small proportion of "too hard" fruit (0% to 19.3%). The work gained insight into the nature of the firmness distributions for sweet cherries and the type of statistics that are most appropriate for analyzing the data.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 070783279

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Characterizing the Frequency Distributions for Fruit Firmness of Sweet Cherry Cultivars. HortScience 51(6): 775, 2016

Sweet Cherry Fruit Firmness and Postharvest Quality of Late-maturing Cultivars Are Improved with Low-rate, Single Applications of Gibberellic Acid. HortScience 48(8): 1010-1017, 2013

Sweet Cherry Fruit Firmness and Postharvest Quality of Late-maturing Cultivars Are Improved with Low-rate, Single Applications of Gibberellic Acid. HortScience 48(8): 1010-1017, 2013

Relationship of soluble solids alcohol insoluble solids fruit calcium and pectin levels to firmness and surface pitting in sweet cherry prunus avium cultivars lambert and bing fruit. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 107(1): 151-154, 1982

Cracking index fracture plasma and distributions on the fruit surface of several sweet cherry cultivars. Journal of the Yamagata Agriculture and Forestry Society 48: 75-78, 1991

The study of compatibility and incompatibility of some sweet cherry cultivars in fertilization and fruit set of sweet cherry cv. 'Siah Mashhad'. Seed and Plant 14(4): Pe30-Pe38, en 4, 1999

Gibberellic acid increases fruit firmness, fruit size, and delays maturity of 'Sweetheart' sweet cherry. Journal of American Pomological Society 56(4): 219-222, 2002

Fruit growth, firmness and cell wall hydrolytic enzyme activity during development of sweet cherry fruit treated with gibberellic acid (GA(3)). Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 77(5): 615-621, 2002

New Insights into Fruit Firmness and Weight Control in Sweet Cherry. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 33(4): 783-796, 2015

Assessment of components of fruit firmness in selected sweet cherry genotypes. HortScience 23(5): 902-904, 1988

Assessing varieties of sweet cherry for firmness of attachment of the fruit to the stalk. Sadovodstvo, Vinogradarstvo i Vinodelie Moldavii 5: 51-52, 1978

Differences in levels of pectic substances and firmness in fruit from six sweet cherry genotypes. Journal of American Pomological Society 56(4): 197-201, 2002

Developmental changes in cell wall polysaccharides from sweet cherry Prunus avium L cultivars with contrasting firmness. Postharvest Biology and Technology 84: 66-73, 2013

Fruit weight, firmness and soluble solids content during ripening of Karesova cv. sweet cherry. Zahradnictvi Horticultural Science 29(3): 92-98, 2002

Firmness of sweet cherry prunus avium fruit following multiple applications of gibberellic acid. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 110(6): 775-777, 1985