Die Konfigurationsfrequenzanalyse. XXIb: Typenanalyse bivariater Verlaufskurven von Hyper- und Nermotonikern - L'analyse de fréquence de configuration. XXIb. Analyse de type des courbes de réponse bivariée des sujets hypertensifs et normaux - Configural frequency analysis, XXIb. Type analysis of bivariate response curves in hypertensive and normotensive subjects
Lienert, G.A.; Netter, P.
Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychopathologie und Psychotherapie 33(1): 77-88
1985
ISSN/ISBN: 0723-6557
Accession: 074862266
PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90
Related References
Fang, L.K.; Keenan, K.E.; Carl, M.; Ojeda-Fournier, H.; Rodríguez-Soto, A.E.; Rakow-Penner, R.A. 2022: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Reproducibility Across 3 T Scanners in a Breast Diffusion Phantom Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Jmri 2022: E28355Ye, X.-H.; Gao, J.-Y.; Yang, Z.-H.; Liu, Y. 2014: Apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility of the pancreas measured at different MR scanners using diffusion-weighted imaging Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Jmri 40(6): 1375-1381
Zhu, J.; Zhang, J.; Gao, J.-Y.; Li, J.-N.; Yang, D.-W.; Chen, M.; Zhou, C.; Yang, Z.-H. 2017: Apparent diffusion coefficient normalization of normal liver: will it improve the reproducibility of diffusion-weighted imaging at different MR scanners as a new biomarker? Medicine 96(3): E5910
Corona-Villalobos, C.P.; Pan, L.; Halappa, V.G.; Bonekamp, S.; Lorenz, C.H.; Eng, J.; Kamel, I.R. 2013: Agreement and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of dual-b-value and multi-b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla in phantom and in soft tissues of the abdomen Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 37(1): 46-51
Merhemic, Z.; Imsirovic, B.; Bilalovic, N.; Stojanov, D.; Boban, J.; Thurnher, M.M. 2018: Apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility in brain tumors measured on 1.5 and 3 T clinical scanners: a pilot study European Journal of Radiology 108: 249-253
Tagliafico, A.; Rescinito, G.; Monetti, F.; Villa, A.; Chiesa, F.; Fisci, E.; Pace, D.; Calabrese, M. 2012: Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the normal breast: reproducibility of DTI-derived fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T La Radiologia Medica 117(6): 992-1003
O'Flynn, E.A.M.; Morgan, V.A.; Giles, S.L.; deSouza, N.M. 2012: Diffusion weighted imaging of the normal breast: reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and variation with menstrual cycle and menopausal status European Radiology 22(7): 1512-1518
Fedeli, L.; Belli, G.; Ciccarone, A.; Coniglio, A.; Esposito, M.; Giannelli, M.; Mazzoni, L.N.; Nocetti, L.; Sghedoni, R.; Tarducci, R.; Altabella, L.; Belligotti, E.; Benelli, M.; Betti, M.; Caivano, R.; Carni', M.; Chiappiniello, A.; Cimolai, S.; Cretti, F.; Fulcheri, C.; Gasperi, C.; Giacometti, M.; Levrero, F.; Lizio, D.; Maieron, M.; Marzi, S.; Mascaro, L.; Mazzocchi, S.; Meliado', G.; Morzenti, S.; Noferini, L.; Oberhofer, N.; Quattrocchi, M.G.; Ricci, A.; Taddeucci, A.; Tenori, L.; Luchinat, C.; Gobbi, G.; Gori, C.; Busoni, S. 2018: Dependence of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement on diffusion gradient direction and spatial position - a quality assurance intercomparison study of forty-four scanners for quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging Physica Medica: Pm: An International Journal Devoted to the Applications of Physics to Medicine and Biology: Official Journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics 55: 135-141
Rahbar, H.; Kurland, B.F.; Olson, M.L.; Kitsch, A.E.; Scheel, J.R.; Chai, X.; Usoro, J.; Lehman, C.D.; Partridge, S.C. 2016: Diffusion-Weighted Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Semiautomated Voxel Selection Technique Improves Interreader Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 40(3): 428-435
Kim, S.J.; Choi, C.G.; Kim, J.K.; Yun, S.-C.; Jahng, G.-H.; Jeong, H.-K.; Kim, E.J. 2015: Effects of MR parameter changes on the quantification of diffusion anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient in diffusion tensor imaging: evaluation using a diffusional anisotropic phantom Korean Journal of Radiology 16(2): 297-303
Khasawneh, A.; Kuroda, M.; Yoshimura, Y.; Sugianto, I.; Bamgbose, B.O.; Hamada, K.; Barham, M.; Tekiki, N.; Konishi, K.; Sugimoto, K.; Ishizaka, H.; Kurozumi, A.; Matsushita, T.; Ohno, S.; Kanazawa, S.; Asaumi, J. 2020: Development of a novel phantom using polyethylene glycol for the visualization of restricted diffusion in diffusion kurtosis imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient subtraction method Biomedical Reports 13(6): 52
Malyarenko, D.; Galbán, C.J.; Londy, F.J.; Meyer, C.R.; Johnson, T.D.; Rehemtulla, A.; Ross, B.D.; Chenevert, T.L. 2013: Multi-system repeatability and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using an ice-water phantom Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Jmri 37(5): 1238-1246
Iima, M.; Kataoka, M.; Honda, M.; Ohashi, A.; Ohno Kishimoto, A.; Ota, R.; Uozumi, R.; Urushibata, Y.; Feiweier, T.; Toi, M.; Nakamoto, Y. 2021: The Rate of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Change with Diffusion time on Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Depends on Breast Tumor Types and Molecular Prognostic Biomarker Expression Investigative Radiology 56(8): 501-508
Usuda, K.; Iwai, S.; Yamagata, A.; Iijima, Y.; Motono, N.; Doai, M.; Matoba, M.; Hirata, K.; Uramoto, H. 2021: How to Discriminate Lung Cancer from Benign Pulmonary Nodules and Masses? Usefulness of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Inside/Wall Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Ratio Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology 15: 11795549211014863
Toslak, İc.E.; Bilgilisoy Filiz, M.; Çekiç, B.ül.; Parlak, A.şe.E.; Çay, H.F.; Yildiz, S.; Erol, B.; Özel, D.; Sezer, İl. 2016: Application of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Detection of Active Sacroiliitis and the Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Relative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Archives of Rheumatology 31(3): 254-264