Mercury determines pore-size distribution intrusion porosimetry
Oya, M.; Takahashi, M.; Morimoto, M.; Iwata, Y.; Jono, K.; Hotta, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Washio, K.; Suda, A.; Matuo, Y.; Tanaka, K.
American Ceramic Society Bulletin 81(3): 52-56
2002
ISSN/ISBN: 0002-7812
Accession: 076577798
PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90
Related References
Prasadini, R.P.; Nagarajarao, Y. 1993: Pore-size distribution of some red soils of Andhra Pradesh using mercury intrusion porosimetry Red and lateritic soils of India resource appraisal and management: 185-191Zauer, M; Hempel, S; Pfriem, A; Mechtcherine, V; Wagenführ, Aé 2014: Investigations of the pore-size distribution of wood in the dry and wet state by means of mercury intrusion porosimetry Wood Science and Technology 48(6): 1229-1240
Penumadu Dayakar; Dean John 2000: Compressibility effect in evaluating the pore-size distribution of kaolin clay using mercury intrusion porosimetry Canadian Geotechnical Journal = Revue Canadienne de Geotechnique 37(2): 303-405
Penumadu, D.; Dean, J. 2000: Compressibility effect in evaluating the pore-size distribution of kaolin clay using mercury intrusion porosimetry Canadian Geotechnical Journal 37(2): 393-405
Tanaka Hiroyuki; Shiwakoti Dinesh, R.; Omukai Naoki; Rito Fusao; Locat Jacques; Tanaka Masanori 2003: Pore size distribution of clayey soils measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry and its relation to hydraulic conductivity Soils and Foundations 43(6): 63-73
Paz-Ferreiro, J.; Vidal Vazquez, E. 2014: Pore Size Distribution Patterns in Tropical Soils Obtained by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry: The Multifractal Approach Vadose Zone Journal 13(6)
Vitas, S.; Segmehl, J.S.; Burgert, I.; Cabane, E. 2019: Porosity and Pore Size Distribution of Native and Delignified Beech Wood Determined by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry Materials 12(3)
Zhang, Z-Liang; Cui, Z-Dong 2018: Effects of freezing-thawing and cyclic loading on pore size distribution of silty clay by mercury intrusion porosimetry Cold Regions Science and Technology 145: 185-196
Zhang, Y.; Yang, B.; Yang, Z.; Ye, G. 2019: Ink-bottle Effect and Pore Size Distribution of Cementitious Materials Identified by Pressurization⁻Depressurization Cycling Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry Materials 12(9)
Shobha, K. Bhatia; Jennifer, L. Smith 1994: Comparative study of bubble point method and mercury intrusion porosimetry techniques for characterizing the pore-size distribution of geotextiles Geotextiles and Geomembranes 13(10): 679-702
Amiri, O.; Aitmokhtar, A.; Sarhani, M. 2005: Tri-dimensional modelling of cementitious materials permeability from polymodal pore size distribution obtained by mercury intrusion porosimetry tests Advances in Cement Research 17(1): 39-45
Yanbin Yao; Dameng Liu 2012: Comparison of low-field NMR and mercury intrusion porosimetry in characterizing pore size distributions of coals Fuel 95: 152-158
Lin Weiren; Takahashi Manabu 2000: Mercury intrusion porosimetry and its application for determination of pore volume distribution in rock Chishitsu News 2000(5(549)): 61-68
Ciftcioglu, M.; Smith, D.M.; Ross, S.B. 1988: Mercury porosimetry of ordered sphere compacts: investigation of intrusion and extrusion pore size distributions Powder Technology 55(3): 193-205
Gane, P.A.C.; Ridgway, C.J.; Lehtinen, E.; Valiullin, R.; Furo, I.; Schoelkopf, J.; Paulapuro, H.; Daicic, J. 2004: Comparison of NMR cryoporometry, mercury intrusion porosimetry, and DSC thermoporosimetry in characterizing pore size distributions of compressed finely ground calcium carbonate structures Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 43(24): 7920-7927