Comparison of the CIDR Select and 5-day Select Synch + CIDR protocols that included limited estrus detection and timed insemination for synchronizing estrus in beef heifers
Bridges, G.; Lake, S.
The Professional Animal Scientist 27(2): 141-146
2011
ISSN/ISBN: 1080-7446 Accession: 082551698
PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90
Related References
Whittier, W.D.; Currin, J.F.; Schramm, H.; Holland, S.; Kasimanickam, R.K. 2013: Fertility in Angus cross beef cows following 5-day CO-Synch + CIDR or 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR estrus synchronization and timed artificial insemination Theriogenology 80(9): 963-969Fontes, P.; Cooke, R.; Oosthuizen, N.; Carpenter, B.; Lamb, G. 2018: Administration of prostaglandin F2 boxed times 24 h prior to CIDR removal alters distribution of estrus expression in replacement beef heifers assigned to the Select-Synch estrus synchronization protocol Journal of Animal Science 96: 362-362
Saldarriaga, J.; Zuluaga, J.; Cartmill, J.; Cooper, D.; Williams, G. 2005: Synchronization of ovulation for timed AI (TAI) in Bos indicus-influenced cattle using CIDR-based, GnRH-prostaglandin combinations - II: Assessment of estrual and ovulatory distributions with Select Synch+CIDR to optimize TAI with Co-Synch+CIDR Journal of Dairy Science 88: 86-86
Seabrook, J. L.; Peel, R. K.; Seidel, G. E.; Whittier, J. C. 2010: Efficacy of day 23 GnRH for CIDR-Select estrus synchronization for beef heifers bred 12 hours after estrus or by fixed-time AI Journal of Dairy Science 93: 315-316
Foster, H.; Whittier, J.C.; Burns, P.D.; Breummer, J.; Baker, D.; Engle, T.; Field, T.; Wailes, W.R.; Geary, T.W.; Anderson, D.C.; Boss, D.L. 2001: Use of bovine somatotropin in conjunction with CO-Synch and Select Synch protocols for synchronizing estrus and ovulation in beef cows Journal of Animal Science 79(Suppl 2): 123
Bremer, V. R.; Damiana, S. M.; Ireland, F. A.; Faulkner, D. B.; Kesler, D. J. 2004: Optimizing the interval from PGF to timed AI in the CoSynch+CIDR and 7-11 Synch estrus synchronization protocols for postpartum beef cows Journal of Animal Science 82: 106-106
Thomas, J.M.; Locke, J.W.C.; Bishop, B.E.; Abel, J.M.; Ellersieck, M.R.; Yelich, J.V.; Poock, S.E.; Smith, M.F.; Patterson, D.J. 2017: Evaluation of the 14-d CIDR-PG and 9-d CIDR-PG protocols for synchronization of estrus in Bos indicus-influenced and Bos taurus beef heifers Theriogenology 92: 190-196
Thomas, J. M.; Locke, J. W. C.; Bishop, B. E.; Abel, J. M.; Ellersieck, M. R.; Yelich, J. V.; Poock, S. E.; Smith, M. F.; Patterson, D. J. 2017: Evaluation of the 14-d CIDR-PG and 9-d CIDR-PG Protocols for Synchronization of Estrus in Bos indicus-Influenced and Bos taurus Beef Heifers Journal of Animal Science 95: 35
Knickmeyer, E.R.; Thomas, J.M.; Locke, J.W.C.; Bonacker, R.C.; Ellersieck, M.R.; Poock, S.E.; Smith, M.F.; Patterson, D.J. 2019: Evaluation of split-time artificial insemination following administration of the 7-d CO-Synch plus CIDR (R) estrus synchronization protocol in beef heifers Journal of Animal Science 97: 374
Tauck, S. A.; Wilkinson, J. R. C.; Berardinelli, J. G. 2006: Comparison of CIDR and MGA as progestin sources in an estrus synchronization protocol that included progestin, PGF(2 alpha), and timed AI and GnRH in beef heifers Journal of Animal Science 84: 157-157
Ahola, J.K.; Whittier, J.C.; Seidel, G.E.; Walker, R.S.; Sides, G. 2002: Synchronization of estrus in beef cows using Long-Term MGA Select-Synch with estrus AI or timed AI 78 or 96 h after PG with or without a second GnRH injection Journal of Animal Science 80(Suppl 2): 127
Lamb, G.C.; Cartmill, J.A.; Stevenson, J.S. 2004: Effectiveness of Select Synch (gonadotropin-releasing hormone and prostaglandin F2 alpha ) for synchronizing estrus in replacement beef heifers Professional Animal Scientist 20(1): 27-33
Palomares, R.A.; Fishman, H.J.; Jones, A.L.; Ferrer, M.S.; Jenerette, M.; Vaughn, A. 2015: Comparison of 4- versus 5-day Co-Synch + controlled internal drug release (CIDR) + timed artificial insemination protocols in dairy heifers Theriogenology 84(6): 868-874
Esterman, R.D.; Alava, E.N.; Austin, B.R.; Hersom, M.J.; Yelich, J.V. 2016: Select Synch and Co-Synch protocols using a CIDR yield similar pregnancy rates after a fixed-time insemination in suckled Bos indicus × Bos taurus cows Theriogenology 85(5): 870-876
Dias, N. W.; Timlin, C. L.; Currin, J. F.; Clark, S.; Whittier, W. D.; Mercadante, V. R. G. 2017: Effects of delayed insemination on pregnancy rates of suckled beef cows enrolled in the 7-d CO-Synch plus Cidr estrus synchronization protocol and that were not detected in estrus by the time of fixed-time AI Journal of Animal Science 95: 233
Berardinelli, J. G.; Tauck, S.; Wilkinson, J.; Olsen, J.; Gibbs, T.; Davis, K. C.; Dafoe, J.; Boss, D. 2010: Estrous response and pregnancy rates of beef heifers exposed to bulls during an estrus synchronization protocol that included a 14-d CIDR, PGF2 alpha, and, timed AI and GnRH Journal of Dairy Science 93: 770-771
Leitman, N.R.; Busch, D.C.; Mallory, D.A.; Wilson, D.J.; Ellersieck, M.R.; Smith, M.F.; Patterson, D.J. 2008: Comparison of long-term CIDR-based protocols to synchronize estrus in beef heifers Animal Reproduction Science 114(4): 345-355
Stegner, J.E.; Kojima, F.N.; Ellersieck, M.R.; Smith, M.F.; Patterson, D.J. 2003: A comparison of the MGA Select and 7-11 Synch protocols to synchronize estrus in postpartum beef cows Journal of Dairy Science 86(Suppl 1): 50
Kojima, F. N.; Bader, J. F.; Stegner, J. E.; Schafer, D. J.; Clement, J. C.; Eakinsl, R. L.; Smith, M. F.; Patterson, D. J. 2004: Substituting EAZI-BREED CIDR inserts (CIDR) for melengestrol acetate (MGA) in the MGA Select protocol in beef heifers Journal of Dairy Science 87: 255-255
Kojima, F. N.; Bader, J. F.; Stegner, J. E.; Schafer, D. J.; Clement, J. C.; Eakins, R. L.; Smith, M. F.; Patterson, D. J. 2004: Substituting EAZI-BREED CIDR inserts (CIDR) for melengestrol acetate (MGA) in the MGA Select protocol in beef heifers Poultry Science 83: 255